People seem to only have memory that goes back two years.
We went to war with Iraq due to faulty intel. No AI was involved at all, at least not in the modern sense of the term. Just a human expert hallucinating a bioweapons lab from a blurry photo.
Russia almost nuked us due to a faulty machine sending a false positive about a nuclear attack. Definitely not AI.
OpenAI's failures prove that the corporations are the only ones that can be trusted!
I call it a long cut (as in the opposite of a short cut)
I call it the indirector's cut. Not saying it's a good joke, but that's what I do.
For comparison, my Hyundai EV, when I plug it in at home, says "Charging started." So if I time it right I can say "Iiiii've plugged it in, so you'd better get this.." "charging started." It's a guaranteed groan if someone witnesses it.
I'm not sure what you mean when you imply that AI doesn't understand storytelling. It's not *great* at it, but if you formalize the process (outlines, character profiles, world details, external notes, and so on) you can get something coherent if you use a decent AI.
If artificial superintelligence is a thing, we're going to need it to defend against it.
Honestly, I don't see this law passing anyway.
/thread
Here's your comment:
I hate Donald Trump, but I agree with this particular decision.
That wasn't hard.
Legally or morally.
I'm really surprised how many people around here think it does. It doesn't require consent when a human does it, and it doesn't require consent when a computer does it.
I'm going to victim blame. This is what happens when you blindly accept what a computer tells you.
They're 17. Brains don't work right at that age.
You misread OP's comment. They're saying people stop a car length or more behind the white line rather than putting the nose of their car on the white line, and could they not do that.
I'm sure that was the intent, but (I think) it actually parses the other way. It's messy, so I'm not sure, but that's how I read it.
Scaping has never been stealing, of course. It wasn't then, and it isn't now, even with all of the whinging people are doing about AI training data.
The giant brass cojones on Google for suing over that, though...
> That feels like an odd thing to be frightened of. It's not Mars where there are minutes of latency. Why would the Philippines - specifically - be any more (or less) concerning than if the drivers were in a building a kilometer away from the vehicle?
Half-way across the world and thus more prone to latency spikes. Not something you want when you need to be able to react quickly. Or have you never played a game on a server on the other side of the pacific?
I know it's really trivial, bordering on petty, but please oh please give her a different accent. She says "okay" so much, and the Valleygirl accent is never heard so pronounced as obviously as in that word that I really want any other accent. Mid Atlantic, Southern, Cascadian, Midwest, Irish, please anything other than Valleygirl.
Several minutes were spent on the new voices. So yes, you can.
This is an honest question (As someone that charges an EV commuting car at home): Can EVs be charged on the road without a phone? Is cash an option?
Cash might be difficult, I don't know, but at every charger I stopped at I could have tapped a credit card.
Compare this to shark skin in water.
From TFS, FCS: "This technology is fundamentally different from the "rivulet (shark skin) process," which is known as a typical aerodynamic drag reduction technology."
There's a whole WORLD in a mud puddle! -- Doug Clifford
