Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Semantic analysis? (Score 1) 162

It. Does. Not. Matter. That. The. Wikipedia. Article. Doesn't. Specifically. Discuss. Images.

I included it for the definition in the first sentence. That's it. Not because the article is some exhaustive reference that covers every single possible current or future application, which is how you decided to treat it for no reason whatsoever.

The definitions I have provided are sufficient. You haven't challenged any of them, you just keep repeating your own opinions. I'm sorry, but I don't care about your personal interpretation of the word. You are not an authority on the meaning of words.

What the camera would be doing shouldn't be considered semantic

Well, clearly the engineering team at Apple disagrees with you. I disagree with you. The general dictionary definition of "semantic" disagrees with you. But you're clearly obsessed with "proving" your initial knee-jerk opinion is still "correct". It just feels like obstinance at this point. Goodbye.

Comment Re:Semantic analysis? (Score 1) 162

semantics is different from grammar and syntax but uses those as its foundation

LINGUISTIC semantics does. And that is certainly the usual connotation of the word. But semantics can have a broader meaning. Why are you so insistent that it cannot? You are not arguing with me, you are arguing with dictionaries.

Cherry-picking excerpts discussing semantics in language contexts (eg the computer science quote is specifically about programming languages) doesn't somehow disprove the more general definition I have already provided.

But here are a couple more anyway:

https://www.dictionary.com/bro...
https://www.merriam-webster.co...

Please note the alternate definitions discussing semiotics, signs, "significs", etc.

The closest I come to image semantics is the task of image retrieval when images (whole) are associated with their linguistic categories.

What does "whole" have to do with it? It's only valid to classify entire images? Because... you say so? The article says the algorithm "picks out specific elements of a frame — faces, landscapes, skies". That is semantic analysis. That is "units of meaning".

Comment Re:Semantic analysis? (Score 1) 162

I'm sorry, what point are you trying to make?

That "semantic analysis" is an incorrect phrase to describe what they're doing here? It is a perfectly correct usage of the word. It's just being used in a way you haven't personally encountered before. Now you have.

Naturally a huge part of "the study of meaning" is going to revolve around what words mean.

Comment Re:Semantic analysis? (Score 2) 162

Semantics is just the study of meaning. This assigns meaning to different parts of the image.

Semantics (from Ancient Greek: smantikós, "significant") is the study of reference, meaning, or truth. The term can be used to refer to subfields of several distinct disciplines, including philosophy, linguistics and computer science.

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

Slashdot Top Deals

Live within your income, even if you have to borrow to do so. -- Josh Billings

Working...