Against the international laws of war that would be. But probably effective.

Since Putin is an atheist (as am I) he would laugh his head off (as would I). That is about all I have in common with him

Rail and road? Small spills. Expensive but able to be cleaned up. Pipeline? Massive ecological disasters that cannot be remedied. Chalk and Cheese

Unfortunately this against International Law which we pretend to follow. But yes, the 10 could be any of about 40 people though.

Just 40 deaths in Russia (particular deaths) would end this. The Russian people and the Russian soldiers do not want this.

I just had lung cancer, bad lung cancer. I am in remission now and hope to stay that way. All treatment was free and they even paid for taxis to get to treatment. I love socialised medicine.

But we do not want to increase oil production. We need to lower it (and gas production)

Welcome to the 70s. With nuclear threats going around no city dweller is safe at home.

Few functioning nuclear weapons? They have more than anyone else and better means of delivering them.

That I precisely what Putin wants. To destroy its successes and infrastructure.

Have to flag you post. It is not suitable for /. It is too accurate

What, when and how?

Your aunt Sally told you this? Because mask studies (genuine ones) show the opposite of what you claim.

Dunno who told you that but it was a lie.

Making enough of it is, but remember that kid decades ago who built a reactor in his back yard. Not sure how old he was at the time.