"Are we really supposed to question the reputation of a company with a $4 trillion market capitalization over that?"

That was certainly one way to let us know that you're a piece of shit.

Fuck you and the clanker you rode in on.

Oh no, the richest guy at the company might have to date outside the company! How will he every be able to afford to do that!

Fucking seriously?

It's a completely different algorithm to the one that produces the search results, so that's a limp dicked argument.

That's a lie. You're a liar.

What you're saying is what Google's lying PR bitch said.

Bitch.

What I understand is that you were exaggerating to try to make a point, and wound up making a different one instead.

"As seen in the standard spectrum of female romance books, ranging from 50 shades of gray to morning glory milking farm."

Most romance novels are way tamer than those

Yes, but it's still going to be cheaper to pipe the power out to someplace cooler than to pipe the heat out.

Just in case we are lazy? You mean because you are lazy and disingenuous.

Texas would have been blue already if not for gerrymandering. It took an unusual election to overcome it. It will probably go back if Democrats don't fix the maps.

It's an issue which is "solved" either by using lots of power or using lots of water. Those are both shitty solutions. Servers don't belong in a catbox.

This whole story stinks. I believe in the idea that he slept with reports, but he also just coincidentally had an affair with someone who was in a position to receive controlled parts and it was announced the day after Trump shorted NVDA? Too many coincidences.

s/impotent/complicit/

Sure, but there's at least two kinds of luck, the kind that comes after doing something smart, and the kind that comes after fucking up. Shouldn't we give people credit for the first kind, where (for this example) they bet on reconfigurability and reusability?

For me the question is, whose idea was it, did he have to be talked into it, etc.