I do wonder how the "workers" manage to install remote access tools on those laptops.
I have seen/used a a few laptops issued by some companies and they seem pretty locked down. Including preventing you from installing anything you wanted on the device.
Much of the fraud came from marketers acting suspiciously enough to be flagged by Meta’s internal warning systems. But the company only bans advertisers if its automated systems predict the marketers are at least 95% certain to be committing fraud, the documents show. If the company is less certain – but still believes the advertiser is a likely scammer – Meta charges higher ad rates as a penalty, according to the documents. The idea is to dissuade suspect advertisers from placing ads.
They charge the scammers extra for ads, everytime they get flagged.
So they already doing it to earn extra money.
Wasnt there a case somewhere in the US where someone who was charged in court for speeding or something asked to see the device's source code and was actually able to get it. And was able to proof in court that the device was not good enough to accurately provide the required data.
Or was it for a breathalyser machine? Dont recall the exact details, but I know he got the code for whatever device was used to accuse him of a crime.
It's not idiot CEO BS speak if it gives him more money.
What do you need? A phone as thin as a blade?
Put some extra battery in it,, even if it makes it slightly thicker, so it can last a day of heavy use.
In hindsight, this is obviously one of the worst mistakes in history
Depends who you are. Or where you are from.
I dont trust most of the cyber security companies.
Most of them are run by people who may have the appropriate papers, but not the appropriate mindset. They seem to think that its just like a regular company.
In which case I think it should be off by default and you should be able to enable it only 3 times a year, to reduce CPU time being used with someone enabling disabling multiple times.
He may not be the only one.
If the summary and article are correct, it will only need a small number of people doing it in multiple times / places before it screws up the model.
Never used salesforce stuff before.
With that said, wouldn't you need some sort of admin access to do such things? Does the average user in a large org have such access?
So always have some music playing when you answer a phone? If someone records it / processes it, they get sued?
That almost sounds like it may be crazy enough to work
What if there are songs / movie playing in the background while you are talking?
Will they get sued by the music companies for unauthorised recording / processing / some other stuff?
I guess the rest of the world does not get this?
In a way it's good - at least you will be forcing half the world to look into Linux and other options seriously.
I think most of the genenal public thought of Pluto as a planet, but that wasn't enough for Pluto.
For your point (1) I think AMD will have a say on who else gets a licence for x86, since pretty much x86 64 bits was invented by AMD (and so called AMD64 in the more technical circles).
Unless Nvidia only wants to make a 32bits x86 chip
Old programmers never die, they just hit account block limit.
