Comment Re:Well the web is dying anyhow (Score 1) 129
The good old says were when there were about 60 million people on the internet and it was new and unknown.
I think it wasn't social media that changed it for the worse, at least not perse, it was the internet-connected phone.
Comment Our product is dangerous! Regulate free AI! (Score 1) 55
They wouldn't be talking about this stuff if they weren't trying to scare people into giving them regulatory capture.
Instead, the people running the AI need to be charged for any crime it commits and go to federal prison. Then these random little "rogue AI" incidents would stop instantly.
Comment Re:The vaunted "Super Intelligence".... (Score 1) 75
No, they're already training it with its own dogfood. They don't need contractors for that, because they can do that themselves. They're just also paying people to add human data.
Comment Re:See, this is the real problem (Score 1) 104
People seem to only have memory that goes back two years.
We went to war with Iraq due to faulty intel. No AI was involved at all, at least not in the modern sense of the term. Just a human expert hallucinating a bioweapons lab from a blurry photo.
Russia almost nuked us due to a faulty machine sending a false positive about a nuclear attack. Definitely not AI.
Comment Better ban open source AI! (Score 2) 115
OpenAI's failures prove that the corporations are the only ones that can be trusted!
Comment Re:As expected (Score 1) 70
I'm not sure what you mean when you imply that AI doesn't understand storytelling. It's not *great* at it, but if you formalize the process (outlines, character profiles, world details, external notes, and so on) you can get something coherent if you use a decent AI.
Comment China be like "Yeah, let's ban it. You first." (Score 2) 165
If artificial superintelligence is a thing, we're going to need it to defend against it.
Honestly, I don't see this law passing anyway.
Comment Re:if it is not negotiable... (Score 1) 131
/thread
Comment Re:Uhoh (Score 2) 130
Here's your comment:
I hate Donald Trump, but I agree with this particular decision.
That wasn't hard.
Comment Learning from data doesn't require consent (Score 1) 43
Legally or morally.
I'm really surprised how many people around here think it does. It doesn't require consent when a human does it, and it doesn't require consent when a computer does it.
Comment Re:Obligatory Princess Bride reference... (Score 1) 22
Scaping has never been stealing, of course. It wasn't then, and it isn't now, even with all of the whinging people are doing about AI training data.
The giant brass cojones on Google for suing over that, though...
Comment Re:Good luck with that (Score 1) 98
> That feels like an odd thing to be frightened of. It's not Mars where there are minutes of latency. Why would the Philippines - specifically - be any more (or less) concerning than if the drivers were in a building a kilometer away from the vehicle?
Half-way across the world and thus more prone to latency spikes. Not something you want when you need to be able to react quickly. Or have you never played a game on a server on the other side of the pacific?
Journal Journal: SQL: * expansion inside of EXISTS()
[Used gemini for formatting. It seems to have edited the text somewhere, and the table on bottom is atrocious. I ought to come back to this later. It's too late to continue with it now.]