I'm not sure what you mean when you imply that AI doesn't understand storytelling. It's not *great* at it, but if you formalize the process (outlines, character profiles, world details, external notes, and so on) you can get something coherent if you use a decent AI.
If artificial superintelligence is a thing, we're going to need it to defend against it.
Honestly, I don't see this law passing anyway.
/thread
Here's your comment:
I hate Donald Trump, but I agree with this particular decision.
That wasn't hard.
Legally or morally.
I'm really surprised how many people around here think it does. It doesn't require consent when a human does it, and it doesn't require consent when a computer does it.
Scaping has never been stealing, of course. It wasn't then, and it isn't now, even with all of the whinging people are doing about AI training data.
The giant brass cojones on Google for suing over that, though...
> That feels like an odd thing to be frightened of. It's not Mars where there are minutes of latency. Why would the Philippines - specifically - be any more (or less) concerning than if the drivers were in a building a kilometer away from the vehicle?
Half-way across the world and thus more prone to latency spikes. Not something you want when you need to be able to react quickly. Or have you never played a game on a server on the other side of the pacific?
[Used gemini for formatting. It seems to have edited the text somewhere, and the table on bottom is atrocious. I ought to come back to this later. It's too late to continue with it now.]
I had my suspicions, but I didn't want to jump to any conclusions. So for any of you out there wondering how this journal worked out, Web 2.0 is garbage.
https://slashdot.org/journal/161630/web-20-business-networking-is-it-useful-at-all
All we need to do is get some Ukrainian industry assistance. I'm sure we could provide some hardware or something as compensation. If any knows how to get drones to "deliver" in difficult circumstances, it's them.
This is uselessly metaphysical.
If Meta bought all the books they trained their AI on, it seems to me they should be allowed to do that. If you've purchased a copy of a book, you're allowed to analyze it with a computer.
Seems like it'd be a huge cost savings. And frankly, AI is more ethical than a sociopath, so it's a win-win.
...through fear-mongering and telling congress that people shouldn't have access to AI that OpenAI doesn't control.
Artificial intelligence has the same relation to intelligence as artificial flowers have to flowers. -- David Parnas
