I rest my case.
I rest my case.
The Jurassic period. O2 in atmosphere was 130% modern levels. CO2 was at 1950ppm, 5-7 times modern levels.
And humans didn't live in the Jurassic Period. So your point is, "global warming is fine for dinosaurs".
No, I read the scientific research online, n00b
And by "scientific research", you mean Pornhub and Breitbart.
11 years without a major hurricane strike. I was pretty sure the east coast and at least NYC were supposed to be under water by now
Parts of the East Coast are under water.
Maybe I'm not thinking this thing through, but do we really have so much extra air that we can start willy-nilly turning it into water?
And wouldn't a better solution be to just start turning people into Soylent Green?
The 2000 liter requirement is kind of a deal breaker. If I have a 1 meter square device that can produce 50 liters a day, that would be way better than a 50,000 meter square device that makes 2000 liters a day.
And in some places, gathering 2000 liters of water from the air is nearly impossible, in other places, it is almost trivial.
And water isn't always the problem, it is usually "clean water" that is the problem.
So.. Lets assume for a second the whole Putin angle is true.
Thing is... how is he "undermining" our "democracy" by showing us the.....truth? Isn't it the politicans being exposed as liars who have undermined our democracy?
Seems to me Putin is doing us a favor, if anything at all.
There are plenty of unreadable posts. Mostly from trolls though.
This is going to open up whole new arenas of Fraud. Imagine a "fake" reseller "NlKE" selling fake Sneakers that never come.
(Please note that is not an "I" (capital i) that is an "l" (lower case L) )
Incoming Message from NlKE, "%50 off all NlKE sneakers! Buy now using PayPal!"
Please file under "what could possibly go wrong"
Come to think of it, I would notice a new tower as well because of my "Llama" app that uses the towers to trigger actions.
But so long as the CIA/NSA/KGB/Verizon or whatever nefarious agency is willing to forward my conversation about milk to the proper wife, I'm good.
It seems to me that most offices would benefit from having a sensible balance of both genders. For whatever reason, women tend to have a different approach to problem solving than men, which might add value in itself. It might also motivate people to be a little bit more aware of certain aspects of coexistence that are often somewhat neglected in an all-male office - IOW it might make the office-atmosphere a little nicer.
I doubt it. The modern office workplace today is entirely asexual. It's quite the opposite of "Mad Men" (a depiction of office life that I doubt anyone wants to restore). The ideal environment for HR and the lawyers is one entirely blind to anyone's gender. Get rid of the gender labels on the bathrooms, for god's sake, it's causing too many issues. Don't comment on anyone's clothing or hairstyle, don't even mention whether someone is male or female, that's the way. Office romances, once a stable of work life, are horribly verboten. We can't have Dan from accounting asking Doris from Marketing out for a date. Don't even extend an invitation to lunch - harassment is a wrong glance on an elevator these days.
So when you go to work, dress androgynously, speak to everyone in the same monotone voice, and for crying out loud try to forget that all these people are humans and sexual beings. It's dangerous.
Well, coming full circle, one way to educate people is to make sure that your registered nurses are not disseminating quack theories.
You'll need to do this kind of social engineering over in India, then, because that's where all the coders are coming from now, and the ones that are filling all the jobs. It's probably going to be a much rougher battle for the SJW crowd to make the kind of headway over in that culture than they do here in the US. But maybe it will give them something to do while we (men and women) get on with business.
If you're not careful, you're going to catch something.