Titanfall 2 still is amazing. it still stands up, even today, to all us wanna be mech warriors out there. I'm not sure how much it would cost to "remaster" it to the latest game engines and platforms, but if they're not going to do that, it might be a killer way to bring it back to the masses... 10 years later.

Till we have our Y2K moment... That they plead all us old guys to come back and debug their AI code.

In terms from XKCD, It's definitely a way to see it. Although as the world evolves, we as a society collectively view these places to be the new town square.

https://about.fb.com/news/2019...

Well is it, or isn't it? I don't know how to think of it other than false advertising. You're providing your data and in turn not receiving the services that you in turn traded for.

Can we also think of it instead of destroying them, that they were mashing them together? As soon as I saw the crusher, they're probably saying that this thing does all these things, which pretty much the previous iPad did too.

An unpopular way to look at it, but aren't there any pros to rising CO2 emissions (I understand the Cons) but isn't another affect is higher crop yields, higher plant growth (possibly in the rainforests), NASA published an article that basically said it's making the earth greener for now.

From the article:

Green leaves use energy from sunlight through photosynthesis to chemically combine carbon dioxide drawn in from the air with water and nutrients tapped from the ground to produce sugars, which are the main source of food, fiber and fuel for life on Earth. Studies have shown that increased concentrations of carbon dioxide increase photosynthesis, spurring plant growth.

While rising carbon dioxide concentrations in the air can be beneficial for plants, it is also the chief culprit of climate change. The gas, which traps heat in Earth’s atmosphere, has been increasing since the industrial age due to the burning of oil, gas, coal and wood for energy and is continuing to reach concentrations not seen in at least 500,000 years. The impacts of climate change include global warming, rising sea levels, melting glaciers and sea ice as well as more severe weather events.

Which right? Do you mean the right to manufacture or sell alcohol? Because drinking it was still legal (if you were considering that the right.)

"On January 17, 1920, 100 years ago, America officially went dry. Prohibition, embodied in the US Constitution's 18th Amendment, banned the sale, manufacture, and transportation of alcohol. Yet it remained legal to drink, and alcohol was widely available throughout Prohibition, which ended in 1933."

https://www.bu.edu/articles/20....

Freaking semantics, am I right?

I don't think the tool's a joke and or practically useless. I think there's quite a few things that it can help with certain mundane tasks, and by the way forget that it's in beta, it's also the first version of this project. The applications of GPT-3 in general (which I'm pretty positive GH CoPilot) can assist with all sorts of things, is the results perfect, far from it. However as of right now as a code completion tool it's just astonishing, that it does feel good enough to be like a junior programmer sitting and paired up with you.

Just how it predicts comments, and assists in documentation has been incredible. Outputting interfaces, or general programming tasks it's pretty spot on. General functions like sorting or other things like that you really don't need to think about. It understands your interfaces / protocols / etc.

I think the issue we should be discussing is with the in-question GPL code, how truly unique is it? Do we have an example of a line that CoPilot produced unmistakably coming from a particular project that is purely unique to that?

So we should remove all choices/liberties where it is inefficient? Or just the ones that are perceived to benefit the average / majority? But i think this argument is not how the line is form but who gets to stand in line. At some point, what if your thinking doesn't align with the norm? Well I guess you'll have no other choice but to get in line.

i understand the argument you are making, unfortunately social media is in a category that is totally different than bakeries. Therefore there are different variables to the equation that we must consider. how much of a sway does what you read have on your view on a topic? how do you consume much of those news and opinions? even if the answer is close to zero, ask yourself about other people.

this is a free speech issue, not a freedom of religion issue (which is usually the reasons cited for denying cakes to a couple lovebirds )

Social Media's reach is too powerful, it is used as a public forum, and almost needs to be regulated as such. The slippery slope is when people start banning points of view who will be there to defend you when someone doesn't like your message?

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"

... youâ(TM)ve exceeded your posts for the month, or viewed your timeline for the 3rd time. Please try Platinum which gives you the ability to Post / Browse Timeline / Like.

There's a 20 factor test, I don't know how current it is, but one of the stipulations inside of it is:

The extent to which services performed by the worker are a key aspect of the regular business of the company. If a worker provides services that are a key aspect of the company's regular business activity, it is more likely that the company will have the right to direct and control his or her activities. For example, if a law firm hires an attorney, it is likely that it will present the attorney's work as its own and would have the right to control or direct that work. This would indicate an employer-employee relationship.

Now in the case of Uber, driving someone to their destination to me seems like a major part of Uber's business.

I don't know how many games have turned killing Chinese into entertainment value? This isn't a game made by a game company. This was developed by the PLA. Did America's Army developed for the US Army attack Chinese, or really anyone? Propaganda is propaganda.

You suggest that Apple spent a month testing other phones, they couldn't perhaps have tested this in tandem while working to fix their own phone? They showed the testing process. Basically what they admitted was they gave you an X to cover up the antennae, people did it and therefore had something to complain about.

Heaven forbid one benchmarks their product against someone else's. I think the free case is a nice option. Also the 30 days to return your iphone is another nice option.

I think the problem really is... People like to bitch. That, and fixing problems is as easy as flipping a few switches.

In revised iPhone SDK License agreement:

3.3.1 -- Applications may only use Documented APIs in the manner prescribed by Apple and must not use or call any private APIs. Applications must be originally written in Objective-C, C, C++, or JavaScript as executed by the iPhone OS WebKit engine, and only code written in C, C++, and Objective-C may compile and directly link against the Documented APIs (e.g., Applications that link to Documented APIs through an intermediary translation or compatibility layer or tool are prohibited).

[This comment has been removed due to legal action by the Church of Scientology]