Comment Re:With whom? (Score 0) 20
Has to be the USA government, I mean 30 billion yearly... serious money.
Has to be the USA government, I mean 30 billion yearly... serious money.
It has been brewing for a long time, if someone declared to be Napoleon, he would have been assessed for schizophrenia. Today when a man declares he is a woman, he is be offered a way to transition (mutilate himself) and his experience is glamorized and presented to children as a heroic act of self discovery that should be admired and followed. It is not only that we don't treat mental disease, we celebrate it. What else can one expect from society that promotes body positivity as a way to justify unhealthy behavior? If someone is obese, a doctor should suggest that it is not healthy and propose a treatment plan, society should help, not goad the person into showing it off in a weird and sick exhibitionist parade.
Ah yes, this moral panic is totally different than all the other times people have been whipped into a frenzy by an almost bon existent problem.
We have real problems to solve. I'll leave the fake ones to people like you.
So basically this is a new version of "Listening to Judas Priest will make you commit suicide", the Satanic Panic and all the other utterly moronic moral panics that make people afraid of unlikely things.
Oh good, another moral panic. If people aren't terrified every waking moment of their lives, someone hasn't done their job.
So when Lindsey starts reading from her AmEx-approved script, callers are infuriated by what they perceive to be another machine.
If she's accurately executing the programmers' script, I'd say she is a machine. Somebody port Doom to her!
This is a fuckin' awesome idea, but there's an easy improvement over the red rectangle and block symbol. Seriously, dude, you gotta use the sign images from They Live (1988). You know you want to.
If people don't have a government-granted monopoly on their features, they'll have no incentive to have any features at all.
Having spent a whole hell of a lot of time lately on Gnome, configuring it and testing various configurations for rollout at the company I work for, all I can say is that it just works. There's a browser, and bizarrely, printers just work on Linux now in a way they just used to work on Windows, and it's now Windows, at least in an enterprise environment, where printing has become the technical equivalent of having your teeth filed down. Where work does need to be done is on accessibility, so we have one staff member who will stick with Windows 11 for now. Libreoffice's Calc is good enough for about 90% of the time, and Writer about 95%. We remain open to Windows machines for special use purposes, but most people after mucking around for a bit are able to navigate Gnome perfectly well, since once they're in the program they need to use, what's going on on the desktop is irrelevant.
On the enterprise back end, supporting global authentication has been around a long time, and if you only have admins who know how to navigate a GUI, then you have idiots. The *nix home folder is infinitely superior in every way to the hellscape that is roaming profiles, so already you're ahead of the game.
Enshittification, where even the most modest of talents is pushed aside by someone writing "Draw me a picture of a Florentine woman with a smirk" in ChatGPT.
Facebook offers services, some free, some paid, to citizens of Brazil so yes, their activities can be legislated.
This is where his supporters on
We never needed "AI" or LLMs to think we're nothing more than machines.
That just about sums it up. Moving drivers into user land definitely reduces the attack surface. As it stands, antivirus software in most cases is essentially a rootkit, just one we approve of because that low level access allows it to intercept virus activity at the lowest level. With a microkernel, nothing gets to run at that level anyways, so microkernels are inherently more secure.
Traditionally the objection to microkernels was they were slower, since message passing has a processing cost in memory, IO bandwidth and CPU cycles. In the old days where may you had a couple of MB of RAM, or even 8 or 16mb of RAM (like my last 486), with 16 bit ISA architecture and chips that at the high end might run at 40-60mhz, a microkernel definitely was going to be a bit more sluggish, particularly where any part of that bandwidth was being taxed (i.e. running a web stack), so Windows and Linux both, while over time adopting some aspects of microkernel architecture (I believe Darwin is considered a hybrid), stuck with monolithic architecture overall because it really is far less resource intensive.
But we're in the age when 16gb of RAM on pretty high end CPUs where even USB ports have more throughput that an old ISA bus, that I suspect it may be time to revive microkernels.
Right, Bernie will have you believe that this means that the men loading trucks by hand became more productive, yet they are the ones who will not be working at all once their jobs are automated. It is always the company that becomes more productive, the people who own the company invest in new tools and by doing it they reduce their future expenses and improve throughput, this makes *them* more productive, not the people who used to do the work that is about to be automated. The company spends its capital, becomes more efficient. For whatever reason Bernie says that now, that the company is more productive, he will take the productivity gains away from the people who risked their capital to achieve it.
When the society discourages productivity, it loses productivity, this is why Americans lost their manufacturing sector.
When the society discourages capital formation, it loses capital, that is what America will find out as well.
FORTUNE'S FUN FACTS TO KNOW AND TELL: A black panther is really a leopard that has a solid black coat rather then a spotted one.