Or were you confused why things with "Google" in their titles are at the top of the list when you search for "Google"?

It was Stock and cash, valued at $65 million...not just cash.

So, you assign value to some human life, and not to others?

People die in mining accidents in the USA too, a First world country. And you are using Chernobyl, a Second world power plant as your only example.

Where is it clear that nuclear power is dangerous? It has risk, yes. But they can be contained by proper engineering and staff (TMI). If the USSR built a skyscraper, put 250k people in it and dynamited the bottom of the structure - would you conclude that all skyscapers are unsafe and should be banned? (I'm not suggesting that Chernobyl was intentionally sabotaged, but it was the faults of its engineers and staff that led to the catastrophe.)

Easy to say, but unless you don't want electricity - what alternative do you propose? Until a viable large-scale renewable energy source evolves, it really comes down to choosing the best of the bad options. And before you jump to solar, for example, don't forget to include the waste produced by mining for minerals and producing the solar panels in your analysis.

they have definitions for the malware - so I guess Microsoft doesn't have to patch the hole if it can be detected ?!

But why would you think they want you to upgrade, when even the most 'advanced' version is vulnerable?