If you can print rollable plastic phones for cheap, then you can sell disposable phones for cheap. Not everyone wants overpriced premium looking jewelry that they have to treat with care.
You have to treat the plastic screen with more care than the modern glass screen.
It almost always gives shit answers. Any time I search for details of things I know about it jumps in to tell me some shit I know is wrong. Every. Fucking. Time.
Oh look, moving the goalposts.
What a fucking clown.
Haha you think our votes are counted
they are testing them so that we don't have to.
Unfortunately, we do have to. I have to this morning.
I am curious what replaces top notch journalism these days.
This is a story about AP. They haven't been top notch in years, if ever. Their stories are purely surface-level. They're an important part of the picture, but certainly not top notch.
Why glass? Plastic would work just as well.
No, it wouldn't, and that's why. We started using glass on phones for a reason, and that reason is that it works better.
Surely she's overjoyed by a line of nonfunctional pixels and your objection is logical.
No, wait, scratch that. That's all 100% wrong, and you're going nutso.
Send in the Marines or shut the fuck up.
Are you sure that's what you want? It's become clear that they will in fact send the Marines.
It runs MacOS and it's pretty fast, unlike any netbook ever.
Yeah it's got gimped specs but they will be fine for most users, unlike netbooks.
[learn to internet]
Everyone who cares about this already knows this
You don't actually care
So fuck off
Right, that's why my karma is maxed and you have to post anonymously because it actually makes your posts more visible.
They define 133-400k "family of 3" as "upper middle class".
Which is just patent bullshit.
All it is, is they keep the same old income brackets for "middle class" while inflation pushes wages and COL higher. There are actually far fewer people able to maintain a 1990s "middle class" lifestyle, and I'd argue most of these "upper middle class" people are living month to month. "Middle class" used to mean you were financially secure and had investments and retirement. That's a joke for most people under 50.
They're defining upper middle class as " family of three earning $133,000 to $400,000 per year". So that's 2 middle aged adults + an adult child as the upper barrier.
What's that mean for your typical "family of 2"? Do they normalize on 3 incomes and play funny with the figures, using extrapolation for the third?
Because the cost of living has increased. $133k is going to just barely buy you a house in most of the country. Is starter home ownership "upper middle class"?
Absolutely not.
This is just inflation, and a disingenuous bullshit article in the NYT (as you can expect, at best). The middle class is markedly smaller, not larger, and they're just using old income brackets to define "upper middle class".
Bison don't produce as much methane as cows
Overflow on /dev/null, please empty the bit bucket.
