
Although I'm certain the person designing the SAN had a blast doing so and did an excellent job, it still seems it would have been faster/easier to go with a pre-existing SAN/DB system such as Oracle's exadata2
I've personally witnessed the exadata2 process close to the advertised 1,000,000 iops(well it was in a controlled demo environment done by oracle, but still, it was impressive).
I'd also be curious in how much the second SAN would cost. If the first one costs $1, will the second one be cheaper and thus justifying developing the system in house?
My biggest beef with oracle is the fact they actually rely on license violations as part of their revenue.
It is way too easy to accidentally violate license terms.
In addition to the cartography/geography department, some universities do this in a GIS department. GIS departments will likely be great sources for information on digitizing. Just read the bios of the professors in the departments and email the ones that sound like they would be interested. If the university is not interested in helping you, chances are you'll be able to find some cheap and high quality slave^H^H^H^H^H grad student labor to do this for you. Also check if your local university has a population/demographics center; they also tend to be interested in this type of data.. Old maps are of high value for historians as well.
Now if you are not wanting to share the contents of the maps, that might put a hiccup in this strategy.
Surprise due today. Also the rent.