You don't seem to understand what "settled" means. "Settled" doesn't mean that new evidence is rejected;
Apparently you don't understand how the AGWCC folk intend to use the term settled science, as we can see new evidence contrary to their pet positions being consistently and continually rejected, even to the point now that they want to use USA RICO law to persecute those who have the temerity to hold an opposing position.
"We learn from history that we learn nothing from history." -- George Bernard Shaw