Yes, there is legitimate concern that all consumers will have to pay more for electricity. Fair enough. So ensure that the new consumers pay all the costs of their arrival, by requiring that electricity prices will not rise faster than inflation as long as the data centre is active. That's a condition for building the centre, otherwise electricity will not be provided.
This suggests EIGHT years. I do agree that Fairphone's website is not helpful!
Though as barely a power user in mobiles, that's not hard to achieve. But I do love the commitment to repairability etc. Let's hope big Android vendors start to take the same approach.
This pattern has worked in both South Korea and Taiwan, so the assumption was made that the Chinese would similarly move to democracy as their people flourished. This proved to be incorrect, but it's not fair to blame one party for this; everyone assumed it.
The crucial shift was their admission to the World Trade Organisation in about 2000 - which gave them largely unfettered access to Western markets. They have played the game amazingly well - in practice stealing tech from joint enterprises as well as more literally. But they have also become the workshop of the world, massively damaging western industry as a result.
The consensus view of the establishment is now that China is a major threat. But this has taken a long time to sink in, and there are relatively few easy ways to put pressure on the CCP. The most we can hope for is that the growing issues such as a massive numerical imbalance of young men and young women, as well growing youth unemployment will lead to a collapse. But that's not a happy thought.
i.e. feeling they should be as unavailable for abuse as possible. Yet it's clear there is growing evidence of scenarios where they are effective cures, so the need to make them somewhat available is a lot stronger.
The fact of psycho active drugs destroying people completely - most famously Syd Barret, the first lead singer of Pink Floyd - makes me twitchy about them. But perhaps reserving them to 'last resort' is inappropriate. Thanks for the question.
It's clear that these psycho active drugs should have the same status Electro-Convulsive therapy - to be resorted to when nothing else works. The willingness to use ECT but not these chemicals is a prejudice driven mistake.
You were doing great until the sentence starting 'money'. If you'd stopped then, it would have been much better!
Almost by definition those who are teachers, and especially in senior leadership roles, are the ones who did well at school and feel that it was a positive environment for them. They have this idea that kids have any significant interest in learning. Before AI kids had to engage a bit to pass; now they can (more easily) cheat.
Modern technology is enabling options - such as remote attendance at 'classes' that are in practice non-interactive lectures - which challenge the education blob. Most of them don't have the imagination to consider alternatives - look at the response to the evidence that later starts improve high school results - or realise that their jobs are on the line so prefer to avoid opening up the root to their own redundancy. Add in the resistance of parents who will expect their kids to be taught like them, and nothing is going to change without some big changes. The result will be ever more cynical and unmotivated children in our schools and ever poorer real outcomes, though those will be hidden by grade inflation and the standard solution to that - fixed proportions of students getting certain grades.
Hmmm....
Given that there is little prospect of the deep state giving up its toys, the debate comes down to a question of whether it's better to reduce false positives. On THAT basis the UK/EU style wins. OTOH false positives are what allows campaigners about the system to build up a case against it. So is it better that a few should suffer in order that there is a better chance for freedom for the masses?
THEGODDESSOFTHENETHASTWISTINGFINGERSANDHERVOICEISLIKEAJAVELININTHENIGHTDUDE
