Good luck changing NY price control laws. There's about 100 years of precedence and rulings that the ISP's are trying to circumvent which SCOTUS will more than likely just ignore and let the law stand on merit.

This NY based law has nothing to do with the FCC. NY has a long history of price control (section 396-r) it's about the only thing they get right for low income family housing.

The new broadband law is just using nearly 100 years of price control as a legal benchmark which any reasonable federal court would honor (and they did) SCOTUS is unlikely to even rule on this as it's fair and legal. Not everything is about the belt way.

No one runs them together or 'in series'. The point is to segment large networks apart the firewalls are literal walls between transit layer hardware (routers/switches). All firewalls are ran in same vendor HA pairs and are connected together by router and switch stacks. You could have router/switch stacks that talk between different vendor firewalls but they will never be connected directly together that is pointless, two doors are never nailed together they are on different walls of the room.

Even in the case of a super nat connecting very large fortune 50's multiple 10.x space's you have two firewall pairs with a router pair in between.

Your under the illusion that enterprise security vendor's are not being proactive.
All enterprise firewalls are updated daily, sometimes multiple times a day for threat and malware protection.

What the article isn't telling you is Sophos is a mid grade British vendor that's about at the same level as a Barracuda or Fortigate firewall, not enterprise level.
The scandal isn't that a security company got hit by a zero day that took two days to fix. It's that there are US based companies using foreign products.

Leaving a registered firearm anywhere in the US is a federal crime ask Hunter Biden about it.

No one HA pairs different vendor firewalls together.

1.) All hardware vendor's are proprietary even if they use open source code.
2.) All of the hardware back-planes are vastly different.

You'll never see a Palo Alto and Cisco FTD HA paired together. It's best practice and cost efficient to use a next gen (layer 7) Palo Alto pair as your expensive edge wall and then something like a Juno or Checkpoint (layer 3) pair as an internal set to wall of network segments and then something else for your external VPN segment.

I guess you didn't get the memo in your bubble.
Your extreme alt-left group lost in a landslide that wasn't done with just minorities it was 30% of center of right democrats voted for Trump.

You forgot to site the single SpringerOpen study everyone sites for that statistic which does not give an actual percentage your just making up the 50% number.
Even better it's a computer model with no actual real world testing behind it. But feel free to stand on your ethical high horse looking like a moron.

Someone needs to get back on his meds.

1.) Stop using two ad-blockers it's the equivalent of using two anti-virus programs. AdBlock Plus is irreverent compared to Ublock Origin.

2.) Stop using Chrome, *oogle has fucked that browser up to the point it's useless for anything but Youtube.

Absolutely not because Qnap is not a commercial company and has never made a firmware chip in there life.
It's just a junk raid backup device with no brains.

Qnap has always been a trashy little SOHO prostitute. Anyone thinking they make anything to a commercial grade needs to be fired on the spot.

Please pass that crack pipe around NO-ONE owns a back up car that just sets there in case your other one doesn't start unless your P-Diddler.
Your just making his point even more dramatically.

What the hell does that have to do with Apple not wanting to follow some third world countries laws?
The US government has nothing to do with this issue this isn't even a good straw man argument it's rather childish in concept.

Hasn't been the case for a good while.