You were definitely not alone in that.

"Nihilists, anarchists, activists, Lulzsec, Anonymous, twentysomethings who haven't talked to the opposite sex in five or six years."

...rustlers, cut throats, murderers, bounty hunters, desperados, mugs, pugs, thugs, nitwits, halfwits, dimwits, vipers, snipers, con men, Indian agents, Mexican bandits, muggers, buggerers, bushwhackers, hornswogglers, horse thieves, bull dykes, train robbers, bank robbers, ass-kickers, shit-kickers

...and Methodists!

The border-radius example is definitely a good one when you consider that NO version of IE natively supports it or any of its variants. But, truth be told, why bother? As long as your corners are squared throughout the site as a whole (and thus fit together nicely), not having IE support for them isn't so bad. I've rarely had too much trouble convincing clients that little quirks like that don't have to be made exactly the same across every browser (mostly by pointing out that they'll be adding significantly to their bill if they want me pulling the hours it will take to code a hack that fits).

The thought of trying to do Netscape support leaves me trembling in the fetal position. Thanks for that image.

Granted somebody will probably read the letter of the clause and try to prosecute perfectly innocent repairmen, but am I the only one who sees this as a potential attack on companies like SafeNet a.k.a. MediaDefender? Looks like someone in the legislature's getting tired of the already overburdened Texas court system getting clogged with RIAA subpoenas and motions for discovery.