That's Received Pronunciation (aka the King's/Queen's English) you're describing. More common now is Estuary English.

Seriously - why isn't the header for this story "Some Guy says something outrageous".

Since this guy is no-one in any position to implement this sort of policy, leave him to his distasteful opinion.

Why? About the only people left who use Fahrenheit are Americans - everyone else has been managing quite happily using Celsius for decades. The rest of the world should now relearn an anachronism to keep Americans happy?

But to follow your logic through, you're essentially telling people to carry two single-function wrenches, when one multi-purpose wrench would do just as well. Both wrenches achieve exactly the same result, but one can be used for purposes other than removing pedals. Why carry both?

It does rather sound like you are trying to justify your sentimental attachment to the system with which you are most familiar, rather than accepting it as an anachronism and moving on. I mean I get why that might be hard to do, and there's nothing wrong with being sentimental, but let's call it what it is.

I saw this. The designers claim it works out about 10% cheaper than conventional PCBs.

As they are here also, if the damage is caused by the lessee outside of "normal conditions of usage".

Lessors are responsible for repair/replacement of "normal wear and tear". If the vehicle fails during the lease period under conditions of normal usage, then the lessor would be expected to provide repairs or replacement. The same is true here of residential rental accomodation - periodic replacement of things like paint and carpet and repair of plumbing and electrical faults is the landlord's (lessor's) repsonsibility - they factor the cost of those things into the rental charged for the property.

Mind you, I'm not sure Australian law would even allow a 20 year lease on something like a car.

But it's a lease. If for any reason the vehicle fails during that time, the owner (not the lessee) would be obligated to provide a vehicle that does work, either by repair or replacement. I don't know how leases work in the US, but that's how they'd work in Australia.

I don't think they're expecting that people will commit to a single vehicle for 20 years, merely that they will commit to lease a vehicle for 20 years, that will likely be upgraded several times during that period. Committing to a 20 year lease means you are committing to the lease, not to the specific object being leased.

Parent is correct.

The original run was continuous from 1963 until 1989 - A total of 26 years, which is completely consistent with the claim of the parent post.

Damn. I didn't want to appear to support the racist sites in any way at all, but:

I've been following the "Fight dem back!" blog for some time. On which he posts names and photos of accused racists, along with their histories, states/cities of residence and evidence of meetings that they attend. I can't recall him ever inciting violence, and the blog is being /.ed so I can't go back and check, but to be honest I wouldn't be surprised if someone found some examples which could be interpreted that way.

I find his blog interesting, which is why I've been following it for so long, and I don't object to what he's doing (indeed, I mostly support it - I certainly support why he is running it). And I'm not inclined to say that a direct comparison can be drawn between someone saying "go beat up X, because he's asian" and "Y has been inciting hatred". But it does make it a tad murkier if the good guys are engaging in some of the same behaviour as you are finding objectional when perfomed by the bad guys.