Sounds like Washington wants to be the only one with a back door.

I would have no problem with this if it were clearly labeled as fake and for entertainment purposes only ( some can be quite entertaining ). The problem I have is that you can spend 5-10 minutes watching the slop before you realize that it's slop. And as slop producers skills improve, the number of videos that you don't realize are slop, and actually believe are real, increases. Eventually you even believe that Trump is really good ( or bad, depending upon your initial bias ) based upon made up slop that you believed. Essentially now you can't believe anything that you see on the web. Slop and fake news channels are making us all either cynics or dupes, or both depending upon the subject.

There's too much lying going on in our elections already. Bring back paper ballots and scrutineers. It won't hurt us to wait till the next morning to find out who really won.

What I'ld like would be for an AI ( or any technology ) that could over dub the actors voices in their native language so that I can understand them. In so many movies today the actors seem to be mumbling and you almost have to rely on subtitles to understand them.

Why do they still persist in calling it a sport ? There doesn't seem to be any aspect of enjoyment in it.

What happened to the coral during the Medieval warm period, or during the Roman warm period, or during the Minoan warm period, or during all the other periodic warm periods when the planet was several degrees warmer than it is now ? Triremes with locals flinging buckets of water up into the air ? Just wondering.

The only good use of AI in the classroom would be to monitor kids ( and teachers ) use of AI to cheat on tests, homework, and assignments. Unless you do the work yourself, you never really learn how to do it.

So 50% of Netflix households include someone who prefers Japanese cartoons to whatever slop Disney et al produce

This has already happened in government. Over half the decision makers have already been replaced. The only difference is that instead of being replaced by AI, they've been replaced by lobbyists. The politicians are still there just to maintain the illusion that we still have a say in government.

Certainly Wittelsheim is close to Switzerland, and pollutants seeping into the groundwater would eventually be bad news for people living downstream. But Switzerland is upstream. Can't see it being much of an issue for them.

They're not ingenious, they're just persistent. Remember what an infinite number of monkeys with typewriters can do.

Used to be you could get away with running your own unauthorized e-mail server. Still nobody in jail for that.

Sounds like somebody's looking for an excuse to sanction somebody else ;-)

Perhaps they should use A.I. to review existing approved drugs in light of new ( since the drug was approved ) data. There are probably more drugs that have already been approved that should should not be, than there are drugs that the makers are trying to get approved now. There's bound to be more evidence of adverse side effects after years of use than there is for drugs that are experimental and have little real world use.

Agreed, but that training data will be useless at best and dangerous at worst. Garbage in, garbage out. And it will take a whole generation of minds with it into the landfill.