Comment Re: Perfect example of bad science (Score 1) 159
No but the temperature did
No but the temperature did
Hope you don't think this is pushy but raising cattle uses far more resources than plants. So a plant based burger would be more sustainable, efficient etc.
We don't see this as a lower price yet because, reasons, I don't know, maybe it's still in the early adopter stage/too soon.
I don't mind eating meat but the last beyond meat burger I had at a pub tasted better than their meat ones! So I'm positive about the option.
I'm the same with Android 8.
Be nice if the new versions made the UX less frustrating rather than introducing AI features that don't help me.
Apparently voice control is something a Raspberry Pi can do now.
The 'loud pipes save lives' thing is to get the attention of car drivers that would otherwise not notice them coming.
Pedal bikes (well, non-electric ones) don't travel at the speed limit so presumably less likely than a motorbike to hit a car pulling out in front of them for example.
Electric cars being hit by ICE cars not looking well, there's crumple zones you don't get on motorbikes.
I don't like loud pipes but it's hard to deny they may save the rider's life from a car driver not paying attention.
Also - above 30-40mph the wind noise in a helmet is pretty bad which is why many motorbike riders will wear earplugs (ie usually nothing to do with the pipes).
Um, actually
https://www.sciencedaily.com/r....
You should control yourself and when you don't, it's on you. But you can't control yourself which is why you need a saviour re sins.
Maybe that helps with the confusion?
Perhaps it's a bit like atoms. At the equivalent level of thinking they have shells of electrons you have free will. At the equivalent of quantum mechanics you have predeterminism.
Yeah probably easier especially given the lack of wrist movement.
Factor in the price of fuel (vs the price of electricity) over the lifetime of the vehicle and suddenly money will magically appear (or at least, less will go out to the point that it's easily more cost effective to go electric after a few years).
You can't forget to bring your face to school.
The Guardian article's been corrected now.
A good comment should always anticipate what the digital archaeologist will be asking 37 years in the future.
UK houses mostly use gas for heating and a lot of houses are poorly insulated.
Yep, I saw one on a Ford Focus about 9 years ago.
Daft concept, meant you couldn't check the door was actually locked.
RedHat pretty much did this and much to my surprise, it's worked out pretty well for them.
Even when people move to a free alternative, it probably won't be considered a complete mistake.
The truth of a proposition has nothing to do with its credibility. And vice versa.