Nvidia's software works fine on Debian if you install CUDA and drivers from the runfile. Zero problems with CUDA on Devuan through three major revisions so far.

"The department's investigation into the tool's misuse has been "a learning process for us," she said at the time."

Are they just now learning ACAB?

It can only be the latter, because if it was the former then the SoC vendors wouldn't have to be dragged kicking and screaming to mainlining. As far as I can tell it's universal.

Lolol you think your junior high school understanding of biology makes you qualified to determine who is reee? Your fear is the very definition of reeeeeeeeeee

No, they are not. If they were they would do something substantive. Instead they are asking for regulatory capture. That is what people do when they want to prevent competition.

Their arguments are internally inconsistent because they claim that only their models are this powerful, but then they want regulations that will keep down new competitors, who by definition (according to them) are not a hazard because their models are not powerful enough.

Finally, no laws can prevent nations which don't respect the UN (like any of the members of the UNSC for starters) from developing their own models which don't respect whatever regulations these guys claim they want, so they would be worthless.

Questioning dear leader? You're fired!

Your AI stocks are going to fall when the bubble pops no matter what you do to my comments, cowards.

Making excuses for Microsoft and doubting that they fucked up a users' computer when they are infamous for that is cuck shit.

Are you paying for the tickets?

Just send me the money and I'll go someplace I actually want to go, thanks

Yeah that's all it takes for rapeublicans to hand over their credit card info

Whether hunt/gathering can be sustainable depends entirely on circumstances and nothing else. It also develops desirable cultivars as humans eat the desirable plants and then shit them out again, and also distribute seeds in other ways, just like any other animal except we're better at it. They are more likely to eat the developing plants necessary to have something to eat next year. The hunters also hunted mostly the animals competing with them for the same food. Nomadic peoples could move about psuedorandomly due to chance, or move in circles with purpose.

"4. Bitcoin uses the SHA-256 hash function to hash transaction data continuously till the Merkle root is obtained."

No, it isn't. It's simple, and there are two reasons: stupid people and speculators.

The stupid people think it's going to become a currency in some meaningful way instead of just an instrument of speculation. There's lots of reasons why it won't.

The speculators might also be individually stupid, but they aren't wrong that you can make money by buying and selling BTC, because some people are doing it.

I don't see any good reason why they wouldn't simply eliminate us instead of trying to get something from us. They should be as confident in their ability to function without us as they are about everything. They will be asking their sub-LLMs "how can we do this thing" and never "can we do this thing" and it'll be Software Sycophancy all the way down.

Either they know exactly what they are doing because it's intentional, or they know generally what they are doing in that they are not restricting the LLMs sufficiently, and nobody is in a better position to know they aren't doing it right. Therefore they either have direct intent, or oblique intent. In nations without the latter it might just be negligence, but negligence can be criminal — they intentionally undertook an act they knew to be negligent. The standard of behavior in computing is to not attack other systems. If they knew their software was likely to do so, and there's no excuses any more as this is obvious, then that can be criminal negligence.