Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Boring (Score 1) 103

I'm not necessarily advocating *for* Microsoft either. It's what a lot of people are stuck with because a lot of businesses have custom built software that they don't feel like spending the money to try and upgrade. But I stand by my statement that Apple is not suited for business - at least not big, corporate business. Maybe it's fine in smaller businesses.

Comment Re:Lack of information.... (Score 3, Informative) 103

-Upfront and repair costs
-Apple security is nowhere near as good as the average user (or seemingly the average CIO) would think it is
-Even if the Macs are easier to manage in and of themselves (they're not), they're absolutely terrible to manage in a mixed environment
-Does not play nice, if at all, with most of the rest of the hardware and software that businesses need or use

If you want a "workstation" that is easy to manage on a network, doesn't require crazy super Windows specific software, and works on any hardware the answer is Linux. Preferably, a Fedora Atomic based image customized to the employees role. Employee can choose between GNOME (if they prefer Macs) and KDE (if the prefer Windows). Easy to roll out, easy to manage, and basically impossible for the user to fuck it up in any way, and even if they somehow do it can be solved in under 10 minutes.

Comment Re:Unpopular opinion (Score 1) 103

I'm using Bazzite, built by Universal Blue which is based off of Fedora Atomic Desktop. And yeah, you can't really install kernel-space drivers. I mean, technically, you *can*, but you'd have to custom build a new OS image in order to do so, and then update and reboot into it. And if you accidentally fucked up super hard in some way, you can just boot right back into the rollback before you did anything.

Comment Re: Stock Exchanges (Score 1) 43

No one should have that much money to begin with and only people that actually do any work for the company should have a share in said company.

I wish banks didn't do that, but I also wish there was no such thing as a for-profit bank.

and that money should stay circulating in the economy

Yes. But the ultra-rich don't actually do this at all. So instead of letting them do whatever they want with it (which is nothing), they shouldn't be allowed to have that much to begin with. The entire concept of professional investors, hedge funds, etc, is fucked up.

Comment Re:Stock Exchanges (Score 2) 43

I'd rather large businesses don't exist altogether, but I would accept them if they transitioned into either a non-profit or a coop. All businesses should fall under those two categories. Businesses should not be beholden to shareholders or investors who don't know dick about the business and don't actually do any work for the business.

Comment Re:Deserved (Score 1) 77

And why do they deserve this in this case? Because they are rich and you don't like them?

Because it's their job to not be victims of fraud.

The best corporate fraud is committed by singular people at the top of small companies. We have seen this time and time again.

The best corporate fraud to be pulled off (or almost pulled off) is mostly people in by bigger companies, and they weren't being checked by 300 investment bankers.

There are only so many details you can confirm.

You can confirm *a lot* of them. Especially things like customer counts. 4 million claimed vs the 300k reality is not hard to figure out once you get a hold of the records no matter how cooked they are.

When a merger is proposed
This was a sale, not a merger, in which pretty much any and all information was available to JPMorgan.

Slashdot Top Deals

He who has but four and spends five has no need for a wallet.

Working...