Or just head over to The Pirate Bay and grab everything in a DRM-free format to enjoy.

To be fair, they don't. They want to slightly reduce the sun's output, so that it offsets the greenhouse effect we have caused. So no famine, just less catastrophic climate change (which causes famine) than we would otherwise experience.

The two biggest dangers are that we screw it up and dim too much, with no way to undo it, and that we use it as an excuse to keep polluting.

The UK just agreed a "deal" with the US where the cost of medication will rise by at least 25%. The cost of living crisis is not going away, it's getting worse.

Their model seems to be people who don't use a car enough to warrant owning one, but want the convenience of having access to one and are willing to pay a premium for it.

If you are really smart, yes. You will understand that. Most of my students limit LLM use, also because they have to pass an exam without. But less smart ones? They will just become dependent and learn nothing.

Plato was wrong on this one. He was not wrong to generally be skeptical of tools. A tool needs to prove its adequacy and usefulness before it sees general deployment. LLMs have not done that in the education space.

There is evidence right in the story. I guess you have terminal AI brain-rot.

This is exactly what any smart educator expected and the smarter students do too. A lot of mine are not using AI or using it only very carefully.

What we will increasingly see is a large divide between good and bad students. Not a surprise at all.

Well, the house of cards they have build is crumbling. Absolutely no surprise.

It is just called being professional and wanting a long-term future for your business. Boeing is all shot-term greed and incompetence.

From my understanding, yes. Crime support is the only thing that made crapto viable.

Not debunked and not bullshit. It is just idiots like you that cannot accept reality. Yes, all got hit. No, it was not the same. They all were warned years before by a Microprocessor-Forum presentation. Intel got fully hit with practical exploits early on because the did not care one bit. AMD was careful and only had theoretical exploits for the longest time and it is not clear to me whether there ever were any practical ones for them.

It is no surprise to me you are unable to see the difference between the two things.

I'm not a US lawyer, but I'd interpret that as they need to block commercial VPN services advertised for circumventing blocks.