That still looks like net flows to me, and not the in and outflow for each country.

Net positive flow of millionaires in doesn't mean that many aren't also leaving.

Freedom 0: The freedom to run the program for any purpose.
Freedom 1: The freedom to study how the program works and change it to do what you want. Access to the source code is a prerequisite for this freedom.
Freedom 2: The freedom to redistribute copies so that you can help others.
Freedom 3: The freedom to distribute copies of your modified versions to others. This allows you to give the whole community a chance to benefit from your changes.

The proposal for non commercial use, license otherwise violates all for freedoms.

If you need a license to use it the way that you want it violates the principals of open source.

The concept is you should be able to receive the source code with the default license and use it as you wish. If you require extra licensing to use it as you wish it cannot be part of the ecosystem and is not open source.

I wish we saw the in and out and not just net.

But it's a good antidote to the doom talk we always hear about everyone wanting to leave the US.

That's not what open source means

Quantum encryption is 100% secure (barring new physics). It involves sending a one time pad that is known not to be intercepted.

Traditional encryption requires that P not equal NP, which is not proven. If someone can find a way to reduce no polynomial time algorithms to polynomial time than current encryption is broken. If someone can prove it's impossible than current encryption is secure against non quantum algorithms.

Maybe things have changed, but my smart lights run entirely on their own not wifi network. The switches and light bulbs all operate on their own low power network independent of my home wifi.

For me to program new ones or change the settings (which switches control which lights how) I need my home wifi network up, but I do not need Internet, this is all done locally.

Additionally, the lights all have a fallback that if they lose power and then it's restored they operate like regular lightbulbs.

The only thing they require the Internet for is controlling them from outside of home.

Pigs still require food, that food comes from somewhere.

Google is seeing the emails in its reported spam, it is not receiving them.

That's how the summary reads to me anyway.

Makes sense.

Distributing live TV is cheaper over cable (Or has this changed?).

I think it's because "cancer" is thought of as one illness by people but it's really a type of illness.

Curing cancer would be like curing infection or curing virus. Amazing research is done and shows results. The headlines say something like "cancer cure found in mouse" or what not. The advance gets applied to people and a specific type of cancer is more treatable, but the public just sees that cancer still exists.

Then we get comments like the OPs saying that animal models aren't helping much. They obviously have their limits, but also, they very clearly have their perks.

Wanting the US to not be involved would be a HUGE political change. Like you flippantly throw in a desire for what would be one of the largest and most relevant foreign relations changes of the last 50 years in a long rant about not caring.

Very confusing.

I assume the liberal professional debaters wouldn't show up because they realized they were being used as pawns to legitimize the other side.

Here's an example of someone that came to that conclusion:
https://youtu.be/e--spu93GVc?s...

Just showing up gives more value to the other side if the other side is rediculous fringe.

We've done a pretty amazing job of cancer in humans too.

I know I would rather have today's treatments than the ones from when I was a child.

I suspect that keeps them under the percent gen X that were smoking at the same age, so I doubt it's behind the increase.