I grew up near-ish Shelby, NC. I am not sure I would call a city of 18K back then a "tiny" town. I would reserve that for a town under 1K in population.I think Shelby would be a "small" city or "large" town. But more to the point.
I was lucky to grow up in a union home in western NC but that was VERY rare then and even rarer now. Companies love to come to NC for those low wages and very low unionization rate.I wonder if all of this would have happened had the workers been paid a decent wage and benefit package?
In the 1990s I somehow came across a CD-ROM that was about careers. I am not sure who funded it but it had a union label. I think it was an AIW label or maybe UPIU label. (AIW was the old UAW-AFL union that was renamed AIW after the AFL-CIO merger to avoid confusion with the UAW that also existed, first as UAW-CIO and then UAW-AFL-CIO after the AFL-CIO merger. The AIW merged with UPIU (Paperworkers) and the UPIU eventually merged in the USW (Steelworkers.) ) Anyway I had never seen a union label on a vinyl record or a CD or any type. So this piqued my interest. I did some digging around and I think this was a WB pressing plant. At one time it was pressing vinyl but transitioned to CDs at some point (maybe with vinyl still going at the time.) Being a union plant for decades, I assume, I would think the production workers had earned some decent wages and benefits. Likely good enough that the risk of losing those wages and benefits outweighed the potential that could be earned through taking data out of the factory and then being caught.
I wonder if data capture before it was ready for release to the public was a problem at the unionized plant compared to the non-union, low wage plant in Right to Work for Less North Carolina. If it was worse in Shelby, as I conjecture, it would be telling that corporate greed that pushed wages lower led to the file sharing of music later.