For the people at the bottom, any amount of tax hurts more than the people at the top, whether it is on income or on transaction. Each dollar of tax is a far higher percent of total income, so the impact is greater even when the dollar amounts are smaller. There are lots of folks in our economy for whom an extra $50 per month is huge improvement in life quality. If you can zero out the tax on fundamentals -- food, clothing, gas, utilities, road tolls -- then sales taxes are a lot more fair, placing the burden onto the parts of the economy that can afford it (and onto those who most benefit from a stable societal environment).

But a dollar is worth more to a poor person than to a rich person. Flat taxes have greater impact on the poor than on the rich.
What we really need is a *continuous gradient* tax system that ratchets up to 100% as you cross about $50 million -- you're free to give the excess away before tax day, but one way or another, you don't get to keep enough money to swing the economy by yourself.

Not quite -- you either learned there were two hemispheres of the brain, or you learned there was an older section of the brain and a more modern section. Both are true and I'm not sure which one you're mistaking for this research. What this discovery says is that the old and new systems are not the same brain, not the same cell types, not the same anything except in tight proximity to each other. It's a pretty big discovery and not something covered in the past.

The statement was âoeintention". Making mistakes on the world stage is expected. But unlike Reagan, Nixon, Clinton, Obama, Bush, Bush, or Ford, we now have a president who has no intention of helping anyone who does not worship Trump. The others tried, with varying degrees of success and varying levels of intellect, to benefit the whole USA.

Do you pay for Google search?! If not, it is not SaaS. As the saying goes, you are the product.

Just focusing on new music has previously been shown to cause distraction, according to references in the article. It is unknown if that effect is strong enough to account for theses stats.

The summary said they did not have a mechanism for causation. The summary said "linked". Several causes were theorized but would need study.

The data analysis appears to be correct. What makes it propaganda?

These are many of the same Anthropic researchers who have been working on safe deploy for years. They have not given up hope. And they continue to publish their findings. These are not new voices of questionable provenance.

My bad. I honestly missed the undo part.

The prompt was to bump someone off the waiting list. That is the user using the accelerator to violate the speed limit, to use the analogy.

The prompt to do something about a fact that is pretty clearly not something you should be able to do (bumping others on the wait list) is a problematic prompt. And the user did not follow it with, "Oops, undo that" once the user saw the result. Sketchy prompt followed by zero attempt to rectify means criminal trespass to me.

Sure, security could be better. But. Even if I leave a door unlocked, if I put up signs directing people to keep out, it is a crime in most jurisdictions I know of to walk in.

But do you need those data items for every single client all at once? Why not (weak example to make point) one login for customers A through M and another for N through Z? If someone breaks security for a system, they should not ever be staring at a database of *everything*. Maybe divide customers by region? Or class of freight? It is insane to me that any user's login carries the ability to see all the data downloaded in this attack.

What person needs all the addresses *at once*? Why is there not separation by class of freight or by region? Why isn't there some requirement to query multiple databases that would set off alarms that someone is touching so many parts?