Comment Re: we can't prevent identification in public alre (Score 1) 85
Perhaps you should grasp what "being on facebook" means.
It does not mean they have collected somehow some data about you
Perhaps you should grasp what "being on facebook" means.
It does not mean they have collected somehow some data about you
It only tags my friends
Because existing cameras do not report it to the big brother.
Ooops, what a stupid question.
What is going on if one has such a tech rolled out?
It is not really only about where a person is spotted: but the conclusion where it right now can't be. For example: not at home.
As soon as such glasses are hackable, you can set up a person of interest as a world wide target. Not necessarily to haunt it, but to burgle his/her house, or what ever you can when you know where the person is. Abduct the kids, fuck the spouse.
Well, I mostly work on refactoring code.
Did not yet do myself a AI supported coding project from scratch.
However you have a point. Knowing your own code base is very nice in big projects.
That is a myth.
Clean water was everywhere. Or other way around: mostly everywhere. Especially where the old roman aqueducts still were working and maintained. River water is clean enough, or springs or water from an underground well.
Beer drinking, especially strong beer, came from Monks who wanted to cheat during lent time. Because they could not "eat", they came to the idea to make strong beers, not only strong in alcohol, but heavy in sugars and carbohydrates.
There is a reason why beer is called the liquid bread.
There is no Christian law against drinking alcohol (and most certainly not at specific days). A la contraire: at mass, wine is served!
And strictly speaking, there is also no Islam law against alcohol. Most of them misinterpret it, or have a culture where alcohol is tolerated. There are only a few Islam countries where alcohol is a problem.
The anti alcohol laws where of course promoted by "Christians" but that where splinter groups and has nothing to do with Bible or what ever. Probably "protestants" wanted to separate themselves more from Catholics and wanted to be "better".
Germans were ok with it but other people from other places thought it awful
That is nonsense. Germans were not okay with it. But we could not do anything about it.
The worst is that most of "the haters" -aka- grandpas, either indeed never tried it, or are simply not competent enough to write a prompt to an AI.
That means their conclusions are based on wrong premises.
If you mean the two applications in question, yes.
Also, screw CO2 footprints.
I try to keep mine as low as possible.
I am German.
I do not need to know the fine details of a patchwork grammar like English's
Also: I would call that a spelling mistake, not a grammar mistake, but up to you
Look at it from the point of view of one writing "user stories".
The system is described by all the stories together. You do not have a single detailed gigantic requirements document. Unless you generate it from the stories, which is most of the time pointless
Does not matter if a story is a real user story or a technical requirement
I was about to write the same.
On top of that, you have your code in git - or similar.
So? Just revert the change!
And as organization of your work: write every specc into its own file.
Let the AI show you the proposed code changes, and only accept them when they are okay.
Fix the specc/prompt until the AI does it right.
With that attitude you are not a real programmer either.
And on top of that: an idiot.
The code an AI writes is exactly the same as an seniour developer would write.
Debugging is also exactly the same.
And AI tools comment the code just like YOU would.
AI can't do this, it can't explain why, and it can't break down the steps, which means you're programming with blinders on.
This is utter nonsense.
That is unlikely.
A software developer is simply better in setting up an AI agent, and formulating the tasks.
A manager can, if at all, define something like a use case
A "normal" manager can not do that
What is getting obsolet, will be managers and not software developers. There are hundreds of 100% AI companies in Germany, they a 2 level hierarchy. Some bosses/owners and then a group of developers. They do not have "managers"
To understand a program you must become both the machine and the program.