Comment Yes but (Score 1) 58
When TDF compares LibreOffice with Microsoft Office (https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Feature_Comparison:_LibreOffice_-_Microsoft_Office), they claim (among other things) that the latter doesn't offer Styles, while the former offers partial support for Table Styles. Although I've used OpenOffice / LO almost exclusively for the last 20 years, I find it hard to take them seriously when they make such blatantly false claims. Microsoft Office is much stronger when it comes to Styles, and LibreOffice offers zero support for Table Styles -- actually, it's worse than zero, because what they call "styles" isn't really styles at all; it's just a macro that you can't remove once applied to a table.
LO also has terrible formula quality with stretching symbols such as matrix brackets, and Kohei messed up paragraph borders ages ago causing thin gaps to paragraph borders. They still don't fix these issues but instead come up with silly experiments such as interpreting pasted plaintext as markdown, leading to data loss if you paste stuff that happens to have some similar elements to Markdown.
Seriously, LO needs to fix its own issues and stop complaining about Microsoft. It's a shame because it has some great features (eg. the unified Draw/Writer), far better vector graphics support, far better PDF export, etc. which is what's holding me to it for so long.