You can stop them from pretending to be you or to be an authorized delivery service by your restaurant, but you can't stop someone from offering a pick-up service.

They either need to be technical enough to actually understand what is happening, or inept enough to trust their engineers and stay out of their way. Its the guy who isn't technical enough but thinks he is that becomes the problem.

Do we really need the government to regulate this? To save people $10 when they buy a new phone? What if they passed this when mini usb was the standard we wouldn't have USB C now.

Buy a t-shirt if you want a physical memento. Now that we have cameras in our pockets everywhere we go we can record many more memories of events than a paper ticket can provide.

Any bill this popular is going to get a lot of BS attached to it and won't pass. One party won't be able to resist being able to point the finger at the other and blame them for not blocking robocalls

We aren't poor and whiny

You can get cheap android devices for almost nothing. I really don't understand why graphing calculators are a thing anymore.

I think it will be a good option for a lot of suburban truck owners. I have a Tundra and love it, but only need it to be a truck on the weekends to haul my dirtbike and/or 7x14 enclosed trailer. Would love not buying gas for the daily commutes to work, or having to buy a separate car for commuting.

You aren't going to get 500 mile range and tow 14k Lb's at the same time

They compared a 4WD to a 2WD F-150 plus the wheels were spinning. All they proved was that the Cyber truck was heavier and had more traction.

Most efficient way to spot a "selfish" driver

Good they can lower their prices and attract more American students.

They standard is that you keep what you had going into it, and you split what you made while married. The idea being in many cases the Woman staying home and giving up her career and future earning power so they can have kids. I totally agree that if you don't fit that traditional arrangement then a different prenuptial arrangement should be made. Where it gets dicey is when it comes to stock ownership in a company. When suddenly the major shareholder and ultimate decision maker changes. In these cases I think the deal should be the spouse, or former spouse gets half of the money at the time of sale. but of course even this is tricky as these major stock holders have many ways to monetize their stocks without actually selling them.

They have the data. Did these guys miss the most basic concept of economics "there is no such thing as a free lunch"? These technology companies aren't running at a loss so they are producing value. They are monetizing the user data. Look at how much these companies are making and you got your value. Not even mentioning the increasing prices the US is paying for internet access.

If your company is only focused on making profit, your products will suffer and a competitor who is focused on deviling the best product for the lowest price will win. Take a small restaurant that turns into a chain then into a fast food chain. They build a reputation by offering high quality food but as they grow they try to save money by having more processed food, mixing more filler into their hamburgers, etc. until their reputation changes from good food to only-for-profit garbage and people go to the next local start up that is selling good food.