I do have kids - and agree they have a mind of their own - but you also never stop being the parent, because they never stop being your kid.

Sound like you still have some parenting to do...

And i was referring to this.. the Goldsboro Incident, where we bombed ourselves twice but only recovered one...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

yeah but it's roped off and in a swamp bog now.... so it'll be fine

You said you "rolled everything into a telecom i worked for and lost it all" not trying to open old wounds, but that's called gambling. Having a lack of empathy towards people who gamble their savings away, or insist on having the latest and greatest of everything, take expensive trips all the time, etc. rather than save doesn't make someone a psychopath.

As someone who flys all the time, this is why i kindly say "no thank you" as it is an opt-in requirement, they just don't tell you have an option.

They say just "stand Infront of the camera" and per the 4th amendment they can search if you consent - it's up to you to know what your rights are - and you always have the right to refuse consent to search without a valid warrant.

And i've only ever had one agent stop me and insist i stand Infront of the photo - a simple request for a supervisor solved the issue.

how you train it really maters.. a good example is a past attempt that resulted in the realization that it didn't learn how to identify skin cancer at all, but rather learned to identify rulers..

https://www.sciencedirect.com/...

not trying to "set you straight" but you did try to imply i wasn't aware of air bus's failings. so pick a path.

if you want to debate Airbus vs. Boeing lets go - your brought up the safety record - also not the topic i was talking about ..

So what do you want to discuss/cross compare between them?

"what about" is'ms doesn't have a place in reality checks - just means both have issues, not a justification for having them.

it's never in a companies best interest to go public with stock .. this is just one of the many reasons why

Can't wait for Boeing's fall from greatness to be used as the Case study in how MBA's suck any value out of a company and run it into the ground.. Getting supper tired of the constant focus on short term profits screwing over the long term outlook and destroying the worker's lives.

So who is the other side of this??? in a stock purchase you buy, they get cash and walk away, so for you to sell the same thing happens. in an ETF - if you want to leave the fund manager pays you out and then turns around and sells the same stock equivalent.

if it's inverse leveraged 2x.... there has to be someone on the other side willing to pay out on your buy.... So it sounds like a bloody bookie/casino vs. owning portions of a company.....

I remember when this was trying to be sold in industrial settings - a lot of "new" vendors popping up with new sensors. all looking for a problem to solve. Every client i worked with immediately dismissed it based on pure security concerns and overall lifetime costs being more than just wiring in a new instrument in the plant.

today is one of the few days i wish for mod points +1 Underrated

Yeah - they where all NiMH it's been 20+ years so hard to remember everything :)