So your argument is that the corporations are engaged in criminal activity? Not sure that's the one that'll win a court case.

So perhaps instead of regulating which users Facebook can ban, they should concentrate on not letting Facebook buy up all the competition.

Bug would be if the programmers made a mistake. This seems to be a failure of the management have the software updated/upgraded.

Ah, BUT the mobile version of Firefox CAN run the ublock origin plugin. The amount of time I need to upload files is vastly smaller than the amount of ads I'd like to block for security (and sanity) reasons.

Options > General > Browsing > Recommend extensions as you browse

So no tomatoes, fruit, anything slightly acidic?

Ravi faces up to 10 years in prison on most serious bias intimidation convictions, but is likely to receive a lesser sentence

The way I heard it, the Linux netbooks just weren't selling.

> I see everyone is in agreement with this.

Are we reading the same website?

Some of us think it's "cute" that Zuckerberg has time to personally slaughter his meals, dress the meat, and prepare it. I wish *I* had that kind of free time and disposable income. Of course I probably wouldn't spend it killing my dinner.

The question is usually phrased, "Do you want a PC or a Mac?"

One of the guys here recently got a Windows Phone 7. VERY nice. However, I was very annoyed that everything had to be done through Zune software. (Same annoyance with Apple & Itunes BTW.) But it really is a nice phone. I was quite impressed by the interface.

Nutritionally identical. Doesn't mean they taste the same. (Also doesn't mean that Coke actually bothered to keep the same formula between versions.)

Actually, it's much better economically to have persons with disabilities support themselves through employment than it is to have them supported by taxpayers. It's perfectly legal and ethical to not employ someone whose limitations prevent them from doing the work required. However, it makes no sense to ignore a qualified applicant because of limitations that do not significantly prevent them from doing the work.

Computers & Internet aren't primarily visual.

Now most video games -- (most of) those are visual.

Most websites, however, are information. Take /. for example. It's 90% text that can be viewed, or listened to as it is automatically read. It can even be easily transferred to braille although the equipment is expensive.

Sure -- flash games, animations, or videos are a bit harder -- but that goes with the the territory. But text-based sites like /., reddit, wikipedia, most forums, etc are all quite easy to make accessible for persons with vision impairments (in whatever degree). Generally all you need is a non-ajax version (although there are standards evolving to make ajax work).

Truly, computers and the internet offer an excellent avenue for persons with disabilities to not only be included, but also allow them to make valuable contributions that they might not be able to in a more labor-based society. From a purely economic standpoint, it's much better to help persons with disabilities be contributing members of society rather than shunting them into the role of simple community-supported subsistence.