Why are people insistent that anything debatable can only have two possible "Sides".
There is always going to be a large portion of situations, opinions, or interpretations that do not have a binary set of possible results. More often there is an finite yet very large multidimensional set of possible conclusions or positions involved in any debate.
Given that, why must so many people feel the need to constantly defend their own interpretation without possibility of revision or allow for the introduction of new data?
As the good old monty python crew once mentioned "You are all different! You are all individuals! Don't let anyone tell you what to do!"
Sadly, the unison that follows is no longer as funny as it used to be.
Think for yourselves.