You just have to wonder at what point does the fight against fake news become the fight against honesty?
Wikipedia covers its legal ass by relying on published elsewhere citations. This is not always insuring honesty and sometime even promoting the continuation of dishonesty. I recall a policy change where any paid editor needs to state being paid and by who, which came up in regards to israeli editors. Only where do you see this editor information on any articles or do you have to research editors per wikipedia article editors to see where there may be subtle bias (and who is going to take the time to do that)? I also have both personal experience and knowledge or incorrect information in a few wikipedia articles, but who will listen?
So when Jimmy comes up with this fighting fake news, its sure sign of using "fake news" as a way to suppress honest news and information.
So lets all jump on the "fighting fake news" bandwagon and realize nothing really changes. But more important, understand why this "fighting fake news" came about in the first place, is simply because people are waking up to the control BS.