I have no idea where your 1.2 GW per person figure comes from, but for your family's safely I hope it is hyperbole, since it would take about 1,000,000 toaster overs to generate that kind of power, though far be it from me to judge how dark you like your toast.
My theory is that he keeps the butter in the freezer.
People whom you know to be burglars aren't likely to be in your Circles on Google+...
YAKTANNTSIO.
(You already know the acronym, no need to spell it out.)
Tin soldiers and Nixon coming... Four dead in Ohio...
Oh yeah, things were always better in the old days.
Brazil is actually an Instruction Manual.
[T]he stated situation is that the people, (phone companies collect data for traffic shaping too), are collecting metadata which is just phone numbers and IP addresses, it's not content, no-one cares about your porn or gambling habits, so don't flatter yourself by thinking that anyone gives a shit about you political views, until you visit the wrong sites.
Oh... Well, okay everybody, this AC says there's nothing to worry about — so, show's over, everyone back to work.
EFF is a joke, I fully expected that to ask for a 10$ donation to keep you the user, secure
Whoa, $10 (optional) for EFF to help keep me secure from NSA & friends' ~$10 billion (taken by force) to make me insecure? What a rip...
I see, we're supposed to trust this bunch who offer no http services but only https via a certificate which is not valid for their domain, are we? They take security really, really seriously, do they? How, exactly? Doesn't that seem a tiny bit feeble? Some of the commenters here are praising this site but what I can see of it is not at all reassuring...
What the hell are you talking about? That's a valid cert issued by a reputable CA for *.boum.org, and is therefore valid for tails.boum.org:
Certification path for "*.boum.org"
Subject: OU=Domain Control Validated,OU=Gandi Standard Wildcard SSL,CN=*.boum.org
Issuer: C=FR,O=GANDI SAS,CN=Gandi Standard SSL CA
Validity: from 2013.01.03 00:00:00 UTC to 2015.01.03 23:59:59 UTC
Further, why the hell would you prefer HTTP for any reason? What security advantages does HTTP have over HTTPS via wrong and/or expired cert? No matter how illegitimate certificate may appear, I'll take it over transferring plaintext.
Not only that, but it lacks the features to exploit. Which is actually an important point in security, to only have the features you need and nothing else. Less surface area to attack.
I don't get it. Are you saying that Romney would have provided better cabling?
ProTip: If he's been making money from it, it's not a hobby.
Or Darlie toothpaste, changed ever so slightly to be PC.
But the logo and the Chinese name (héirèn yágao) haven't changed.
(Sorry for the bad pinyin--Slashdot apparently permits neither Hanzi nor proper diacritics.)
I like working in a place where our VP sits in the same fishbowl as the rest of us, and wears a polo shirt and jeans.
In fact, while I've seem him dressed and made up look like the front man for Rammstein (in the office, yet), I've never (in 6+ years) seen him in a suit (not even in the office).
If you knew where I worked, you'd never believe me in a million years, either.
You have a message from the operator.
