Now say this using your real account, that can be tied to your real-life name, please.

Yes, that's a known problem in chemistry. So there's a growing movement to require an independent lab to replicate results before publishing - Reproducibility Initiative. See: http://pipeline.corante.com/archives/2012/08/14/reproducing_scientific_results_on_purpose.php

This research is total crap.

First, the increase in phone usage is just 7.5% so any effects would already be marginal.

Second, they have not controlled any other factors - people might talk more, from home. Are they talking more while they are driving?

Uhm, other people in this thread mentioned (multiple times) that guns can be useful against a tyrannic government. Of course, they'd be the ones to define what "tyranny" is.

Uhm... Dry ice is already solid CO2.

No, but you're saying in effect that the use of weapons is OK to enforce minority views.

Yes, it's useless for hunting. It has very bad accuracy and can't use a large-caliber ammo. Or do you hunt dears that are tethered to a tree?

Yes. If you decide that your clique has a monopoly on the public opinion and should use weapons to enforce your view, then what stops other groups from doing it?

Why? Don't you think that a home-made infectious plague is a tool to control government? If no, then why?

I'd just discovered a way to make a plague lethal in 80% cases, using only kitchen tools and 3d printer! What a wonderful discovery! I hope everyone makes a vial of it - for self-defense, of course. Or for duck hunting.

Yes, I have. It required conditions that are pretty much unique in the history. Like recently demobilised soldiersm with actual combat experience, and a local government that couldn't call for military support.

Guns are cheap. Pretty much everyone who can afford one gun can afford two guns. Especially since they often require gun safes.

What are you going to do against a modern army? Poke Abrams tanks with a sharp 3D-printed stick? Perhaps, shoot bombers from your handgun? You can not win against a modern army using only light weapons. There's no question about it. Can you remind me which military has given something beyond token resistance to the US army lately?

Sure, if you want to use terrorist tactics (hiding between civilians, striking off-duty soldiers - that sort of thing) then you can make the life of an occupying army a living hell. But if you're thinking about using terrorist weapons with impunity, then have you ever thought about an army that doesn't have modern rules of engagement?

Oh, I get it. You'd prefer to kill toddlers, perhaps even primary school children. That'll surely help your cause.

What's so magical about cars that you can't buy and store a normal weapon there? This printed shit,is likely to cost more than a simple rifle or a gun. So yes, this gun is useful only for terrorists.

Storing a gun in an usecured barn is illegal. So as I've said - it's only useful to break law. Not for anything else.