Wow people seriously talk about "Twitter Files" in 2024? Talk about grasping for straws

It would just end up being all bots if the site wasn't allowed to moderate its own content without being fully liable for the content.

Looks like the "editors" just used the same link to the old story twice instead of to the BBC article.

It's possible he's just a useful idiot for the Russians. When Russia provided him hacked emails from the DNC he ran with it even though there was nothing of substance in them. Didn't see any publication of messages from the RNC at the time despite them also getting hacked (though maybe Russia kept those to themself).

It's a democratic republic so the will of the people isn't directly counted, but due to the way it's setup with the electoral college there are cases when a majority of people want something but we end up with something else

Raises a lot of questions - can they start driving 16 years after they were fertilized?

Well no one says to "weld everyone into their houses for Science!" and "men can be impregnates by women" while nonsense doesn't affect anyone, so definitely that one.

A few reasons:
1. Providing a phone number can expose more personal information that some people would like as the phone number might tie to other information through external databases. A username would only be able to do that through Signal's databases.
2. People don't want to be contacted via phone/sms and don't want to share that
3. Many 2FA still use SMS which is vulnerable to a sim-swapping attack if the attacker knows the phone number

Seems like he kind of blew it when he started acting as a Russian/Republican asset since he lost a lot of supporters that saw him as more neutral.

Wikileaks lost pretty much all of its credibility when it started cherry picking its submissions and doing political hit pieces

I guess if you're completely detached from reality you'd have a hard time believing news sources reporting on real stuff.

*slowly backs away from man in padded room*

Well objectively that's incorrect, but if you aren't able to accurately judge the reliability of any news organization, you should be trusting Fox much less than others

But car and watch enthusiasts aren't the majority of the population. Of course there will always be people that like the old (sometimes more complicated) technologies, but that's not indicative of trends of the general public.

Basically because they're really cheap and "work" out of the box. It IS possible to reflash the Wyze cams with new firmware and you can use a wyze-bridge software running on a server to fix some of the connectivity issues if you connect it to a local service, but it's a bit of a pain to get setup.

I have one aimed at my compost pile to see if any interesting wildlife comes by. It's not super reliable, but it stores a lot on an SD card. I guess someone might have been able to see my old food scraps

I swapped to a Reolink connected locally for other ones.

0/10 troll