Comment Re:Why not test the product rather than the produc (Score 1) 155
There’s already laws against that. For example, in many states they can’t test you for HIV without consent.
There’s already laws against that. For example, in many states they can’t test you for HIV without consent.
We still haven’t rolled out rapid Covid tests to the public at any significant scale yet. A FOBT style test will take even longer.
All that AND he cannot stand any challenge to his ego. He will break government and let people die before admitting he was wrong.
on the same day the Indian government was also complaining about being censored on social media.
False dichotomy. WHO said to wear masks, they just said to wait for evidence and not to deprive health care workers of them first.
Theyâ(TM)re human, and not perfect. But they trust the scientific process and follow the evidence. Which is what you should be doing.
Did you actually read your own link? It was a study of 26 people, some of whom died even with hydroxychloroquine. Multiple Followup research studies proved that French study wrong.
Itâ(TM)s amazing how you can be so confidently incorrect. Yes, actually listen to scientists, which youâ(TM)re clearly not doing.
I never said costs werenâ(TM)t a factor, but go ahead and tell me who is this all powerful âoemost profitable organizationâ that you believe is in on this conspiracy?
You think doctors are willing to sabotage my patients health just so I could score a cheap political point? Come on.
Science shows hydroxychloroquine doesnâ(TM)t work. This was not some worldwide scheme to get at Trump.
Not at all comparable. Hydroxychloroquine was alleged to help by Chinese doctors without evidence. There was an early study of only 20 patients and it was a flawed one. Followup studies of tens of thousands of people showed it was ineffective.
This dexamethasone study has much stronger Evidence backing it up.
Thatâ(TM)s not uncommon, not every drug is 100% effective.
Tamiflu was only around 20% effective at treating Bird Flu, but it was better than nothing.
Another conspiracy theorist who likely believes hydroxychloroquine works and doctors are all trying to hide it because itâ(TM)s cheap.
This movie was just very badly marketed. I never saw trailers for it in the theater, no commercials on TV, almost no buzz beforehand.
Thatâ(TM)s the whole point, he shouldnâ(TM)t get away with it even if he was a public official. Facebook and Twitter should remove hate speech even if its from a politician. That doesnâ(TM)t give you any special privileges. Twitter should draw a line, because Trump keeps pushing it and the company meekly falls back. Will they at least say they would ban Trump if he tweets a swastika or the n-word?
Or you could just make a solid set of rules and enforce them equally for everyone. Thereâ(TM)s no need to carve out exceptions and allow VIPs to get away with hate speech.
Congress was openly pressuring Google to censor YouTube, holding hearings and saying that Google was essentially working for terrorists by profiting off the distribution of the videos. There were proposals to create a bill banning extremist videos if google didnâ(TM)t comply, extending the authority in the TPP to force takedowns. How is that NOT government censorship?
It's time to boot, do your boot ROMs know where your disk controllers are?