Comment Re:Cue climate change deniers (Score 1) 62
Yet you're still sitting on the fence despite 99% of man made climate scientists who are experts and can decide citing it as real. Sounds to me like you've made your mind up but don't want to admit it.
Assume 100% it's real. Now what?
All of the methods proposed to reduce carbon emissions require fundamental restructuring of the global economy. For some reason, Western countries are supposed to shoulder a larger burden than developing countries. Based in some kind of political get-evenism for historical wrongs, I suspect. And never spoken about is advancing our nuclear generation technology, which is ridiculously clean compared to green technologies that require huge battery stores.
This is the real argument. One side talks about denialism, and the other side talks about fake science, but the actual debate is about what to do. If you present people with a solution that is more or less equal to current standards, only more efficient, only the very ideologically purblind will reject it. If you present a solution that doesn't even touch nuclear, people know that something else is going on that has little to nothing to do with the climate.