I'm not a minimum wage expert, but assuming an average 60 hour work week they're paid around $11/hr. Certainly above the bare minimum unless they're pulling 80 hour weeks ever week. I agree it's low. Lower than it should be for sure. https://gradadmissions.mit.edu...

Jesus fucking christ Stallman. How did you figure out how to comment on slashdot with you're retarted Emacs/email based web browsing system?

I don't mean this in a condescending way, more in an educational way, but if you bought anything that's marketed as a "Gun Safe" you can get into them in about 20 minutes with an angle grinder. No thermal lance required. Gun safes aren't even safes, they're "Residential Security Containers" and the fireproofing rating on them (if any) is literally made up by the manufacturer and it's method of action is drywall insulation. Most (all?) gun safes have a nice think huge metal door with literal sheet metal siding reinforced with drywall so it sounds think and secure when you knock on it, but again, angle grinder.

I don't think most *sane* people have an issue with GMO/GE crops cross-pollinating. I think they have an issue with the patent on those crops being used to sue the ever loving shit out of the poor farmer who ended up with somebody's intellectual property growing in his field. I also understand that there are sterile GMO seeds being produced as well, ones that can't reproduce at all without a farmer having to buy more. All in the name of protecting intellectual property

Is this the post-truth world that I keep hearing about?

Just the facts they want you to hear, of course http://www.washingtontimes.com...

Vee's Law. Never fails
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

You seem to be suggesting that since you can see one group earning less than another group that the answer must be discrimination, and not some other known or unknown factor.

I figured you were going to call me out on being a paid shill for PC Engines but w/e

I didn't say person. I said "sex/race/gender/anything (applying any other non-choice trait a person my have)"

I was curious where the data for this report was being sourced, and we can see it's from hired.com. Under their methodology section we see "This report is based on proprietary data gathered and analyzed by Hired’s research and strategy data scientist, Dr. Jessica Kirkpatrick. The analysis in this study was done using a combination of voluntary, self-reported demographic data and a classifier that identified the gender of the candidate based on their first name."

Searching for Jessica Kirkpatrick in Google returns a few articles about her where the highlight is.... that she is in fact a woman. Her own public social media is nothing but a torrent of women's rights and equal pay stories and articles. So we have a clearly opinionated data scientist working with a set of "proprietary data" gathered by a private recruiting organization which focuses on diversity. Was there some other conclusion that anybody expected other then "MUH WAGE GAP IS REAL?"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?... Did you know it's illegal to pay one sex/race/gender/anything less than another?

>be honest
kek

What was Twitter's intention in unverifying Milo?