Comment Re:Short-sighted thinking (Score 2) 414
Maybe we already have...
Maybe we already have...
People don't need planets to live. Or, at least, not to live on. Lagrange points to anchor habitats are a nice touch. Give me low G, controlled weather, and no Mosquitos any day. Get us out of 'natural' ( ignoring the natural/unnatural false dichotomy) environments and in to ones designed by engineers to handle hard human loving.
Yes. Because when you think about luxurious comfort "designed by engineers" is the first thing that comes to mind.
The law is out of date
Apparently so. Given the overwhelming evidence that many of the activities mentioned in this thread do dramatically increase the risk of having an accident, it appears that a lot more things should be prohibited than actually are.
If we should ban looking at a map, maybe we need to ban street signs also, since reading those distracts you from driving.
You can always run denyhosts, block any IP that attacks you, but it sounds like these guys are on your side, doing penetration testing.
If they are not, block the addresses. If they are local staff, call the IT dept. and talk to them, don't post to
People whao are "on your side" would ask your permission before trying to break into your servers. These are criminals.
There's plenty of unsafe behvior possible, but there's no such thing as safe behavior. Until the latest fix, enabling Java was unsafe behavior. Is it safe now? We won't know until its proven unsafe. Same for any sufficiently complex plug-in.
1. f3 e5
2. g4 Qh4#
Bang! Bang!
About 10% of murders are committed by people with untreated mental illness. Your response does not address the other 90%.
Here in the advanced US, they can charge sender AND receiver.
Or every hotel in Florida calling my cell to offer "Disney Vacations"
"Trees cause more pollution than automobiles do."
-- Ronald Reagan, 1981
How is this news for nerds? Taco is really starting to let this site go downhill.....
I guess you haven't noticed what's happened to every other type of data over the last 20 years.
The mistakes
Consider it the Apollo 10 of Mars exploration.
this is a war between scientists and a bunch of postmodernists parading around in lab coats shouting down results they don't like (cultural anthropologists.)
Umm, no. I take it you didn't even read the summary of either paper.
The economists claim that “the high degree of diversity among African populations and the low degree of diversity among Native American populations have been a detrimental force in the development of these regions.” In other words, that only populations with the "right" amount of genetic diversity (i.e. matching Europe) are likely to be successful. The rest of the scientific community points out that they have defined their terms in a way that gives the results that they want, and ignore existing standard means of measuring genetic diversity.
THEGODDESSOFTHENETHASTWISTINGFINGERSANDHERVOICEISLIKEAJAVELININTHENIGHTDUDE