Hamas has made not attempt to not hide behind civilian meat shields, which is never OK.

As ye sow, so shall ye reap. Hamas can end this at any time by surrendering. I suspect that if they released the remaining hostages, it would greatly reduce the fury with which Israel is pursuing it. Unless, of course, those hostages have been tortured, raped, and murdered while they were held.

You should stop doing that, then. But you won't.

So far as I can tell, any civilians being killed in Gaza are, indeed, war crimes - committed by Hamas hiding behind them. IDF may well be doing some bad things, too, but the war crimes responsibility is entirely with Hamas. They hide behind civilians because it's a war crime, and they know that gullible fools - or collaborators - like you will ignore it, and try to get everyone to focus on Israel's actions - which are specifically allowed by those same treaties.

Don't want your civilians killed? Don't use them as meat shields.

I'm also 100% entitles to my correct and objectively true opinion.

I have no problem calling someone an idiot, and it's always directed at the person, not the action.

You're an idiot.

A useless idiot.

Pride won't pay the rent, though.

Is there a source for that other than the organizer?

If you want to talk about war crimes, let's start with the first war crimes: building military command bunkers under hospitals, clearly defined as a war crime by various treaties. Those same treaties also specifically allow Israel to attack those hospitals because Hamas has chosen to make them hard military targets.

But you don't, and won't - ever - talk about that, will you?

You abuse the word "think." Try "believe" instead.

Perhaps that's the only time the protests rose to the level of criminality.

Which side has upped the ante? You have no idea, and don't care. You're far too busy hating Google and supporting terrorists for things like facts.

By your definition, your reply is retaliation. As is my reply to you, and literally every post in this article.

Which is to say, your definition is completely, utterly useless.

As are you.

Legally, that's exactly what the word means. No other definition matters.

There's a specific legal definition, that these firings (apparently) do not meet.

It is the only definition that matters.

Thanks for admitting I'm right, and that you know it. And you're not man enough to just say, "Hey, what I said was pretty stupid, but I was drunk or high, like usual, so ignore me."

The first step to treatment is to admit you have a problem.

You didn't say Disney lost money on Marvel, retard. You said Disney lost money on Star Wars.

Do you actually understand that Star Wars was not a Marvel franchise? And not a comic book?

Do you?

Or are you too fucking stoned and brain damaged to understand that?

Loser.