Yes. However the memo from Director Comey makes it appear that the investigative team doesn't want to let Clinton off the hook. This confirms the anonymous information given to Fox News that the investigative team was very unhappy with the final choice by Comey and the DOJ.
They could also be doing their due diligence.

1. It was the media saying that they were reopening the investigation.
2. Based on the memo, the investigative team members are the ones that don't want to let Clinton off the hook since they briefed Comey and he agreed with them that they should take investigative steps.

The missile is not called Satan 2 by Russia. It is called RS-28 Sarmat ICBM. Satan 2 is the name given by Western Journalists after the predecessor series of missiles that NATO called Satan.

And you get modded as a troll. I wish I had mod points to fix that because as others have noted the comment is wrong.

From what I saw, the issue was with the ad servers not necessarily Slashdot.

It's not like we accidentally gave botnet creators millions of more devices to use as processing power for DDoS. Right?

The part that jumped out at me is this portion.

We saw the fanning of flames after 9/11 and it consumed us to the point of severely damaging the nation. We as a people compromised our principles and public opinion was manipulated until the result was complete after which public opinion was allowed to flow freely again. Prior to the creation of the internet, public opinion has been controlled and manufactured. It still is but the effect has been lessened due to the widespread access of information. It is the free flow of information that allows people to recognize what is happening and attempt to fight it.

My description came from other neuroscientists as I linked so I would be happy to hear something counter to this current understanding of how brains function but for now I will take printed word over yours. I still stand by my point that you have no more grip on reality than those others. I am not entering into the discussion about the effect of money/wealth on behavior as it seems I would be already behind.

The reason why I kept bringing you into the discussion is that I assume people want to be treated the way they treat others so I was treating you accordingly. Your assumption about me is wrong. I love discussions with people who disagree with me because it opens up perspectives that I have not considered and I have no issue being wrong. Your comments however to myself and others on this thread were condescending and dismissive. That is not conducive to discussion. Maybe that was my fault, I started our conversation in a sarcastic tone which probably derailed it. I apologize for that.

Clearly I can't debate you because you have already debated both sides of the story in your head and with others who are not me. The point of my sarcastic original response is that you have no more grip on reality than others who are rich and famous. Consider a reduction of what we know about ourselves and reality.

From http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...
There is a chain of events to follow, Sherlock Holmes-like, from the red rose you gave your beloved, beginning with everyday reality and reducing it, step by step, to get to the source:
The sight, smell and texture of a rose (i.e., the experience), reduce to...
The brain assembling the picture of a rose from various regions dedicated to sight, smell and touch. This reduces to...
Neurons in each region specifically processing raw data into the qualities of a rose (known technically as qualia). These reduce to...
The supporting molecular structure that keeps a neuron alive. This reduces to...
The atoms that compose those molecules. These reduce to...
The subatomic particles (quanta) that structure atoms. These reduce to...
The quantum field that gives rise to quanta.
Science cannot yet explain what happens past this point and where the the source of this quantum field comes from.

So when you say these people have no grip on reality. I am saying that neither do you. We understand reality through how we interact with it and thereby change it at the same time. That reality seems to exist outside of us in the same way that physicists perform experiments and achieve similar results however people aren't consistent tools of measurement.

Lack of empathy, poor decision making and faulty can be reduced by other factors such as the assumption of intellectual superiority. I don't suppose you would know anything about that though.

Again? This is my first comment.
Your original comment is an ad hominem attack on the "rich and famous people" who engage in discussion about ideas you seem to deem unworthy. Seems like you don't like being judged the same way you judge others. That is a double standard.

You must be the only person in the entire world that can get a grip on reality. Everyone else has to rely on their brain's ability to perceive it. Have you told others about your extraordinary ability?

I guess you would have to refine what you mean by computer then.

Well then you better be ready to be wrong.
The Coptic word for simulation Hal was used quite frequently in Gnostic texts such as the Nag Hammadi Library. The Archons who were subservient beings to the demiurge used the power of HAL (Coptic for simulation or illusion) to keep spirits trapped in the material plane of existence.