Comment Re:They didn't laugh at Lewis and Clark (Score 1) 265
People today don't explore newly discovered continents in a canoe, either. Meanwhile, relevancy still exists.
I think the common error being made regarding COBOL is to insist "COBOL is around because it works".
True, it works, I'm not saying it doesn't work because that'd be ignorant. But it's not around because it works ATM -- it's around because it "workED", when it was installed, in days of Yore.
There seem to be three specific arguments for maintaining the use of COBOL:
(1) Because lots of companies are using it, (i.e.) keep using it because it's what's being used. That's why punch cards are the world's most popular storage media, of course.
(2) Because it's a perfect, bug-free language. This is so laughable I don't even understand why the people pitching this argument didn't just stick with the first which is far less ridiculous.
(3) Because $$$. This is the only valid argument, you know. You can get paid learning and using COBOL. This doesn't explain why it's the go-to choice for NEW technology and NEW code, but it explains why people would defend learning COBOL: because you can get hired to use it. Ultimately, though, this argument falls back on the first one: use it because it's already being used. If your job isn't to rewrite everything in something that's a more acceptable standard like C or, fine, Java, then I don't understand why they're paying you. Those employers, again, must be falling back on one of the other two arguments.