"Stereotypical?"

Anyway, I challenge you to do the same on a Windows machine. As the other reply to your comment says, Windows does not have an easier learning curve.

No, it's not. 'rm' is by no means a "low-level power-user interface." That doesn't even make sense. While it is arguably for "power-users," it is not anyone's fault for using this high-level userspace tool for file management. The perception that it is low-level annoys me.

That's a great idea. While you're at it, make browsers W3C compliant too.

I'm aware, but this still is irrelevant to the original comment.

Yes, of course that's a solution, but that hardly falls under the OP's "little or no effort required."

First, I'd like to note that you have no idea what you're talking about.

(La)TeX generates PDFs.

I highly doubt that this is a fair characterization of his reasons for using TeX.

This is the same kind of crap that stops people from using command-line interfaces.

You have the misconception that it is something scary with no understanding of it at all. Word, InDesign, and others have a learning curve too. You were forced to learn Word, you were not forced to learn LaTeX, and so you perceive things that are not like Word to be scary and incomprehensible.

Important: Microsoft e-Learning courses are currently experiencing two known issues:

        * When you log in, courses in multiple languages will display. Simply select English as the language, and only courses in English will display.

How is that an issue...?

And I suppose Bob's dynamic pages mark themselves up, which is why he doesn't do "both" like Jerry.

Who maintains the list of titles known to be unavailable for free?

Also, as stated by other posters, titles are insufficient for determining content.