This accident was stoppable at so many points in so many ways. The problem wasn't so much the reactor alone as the mindset together with the reactor.
This is the same thing that I keep telling the fearmongers who react to every mention of "nuclear energy" by saying "what about Chernobyl OMG". The RBMK reactor was basically designed by idiots who didn't give a shit about the concept of a "containment vessel". All of the "news articles" that keep flipping out about this are really making me sick. Yes, it was a tragedy; yes, the human consequences will last for a very, very, very long time. Yes, it's completely under-reported. I give you that. But these "journalists" really need to stop making completely unfounded comparisons, because they're just encouraging people to revert to being dumb, panicky animals, who can't actually apply the laws of physics and basic engineering principles.
But then again... if people in general were capable of feats of that magnitude, we'd solve a lot of problems. Ugh. Time to crawl back into my cave.
I don't know how it works exactly, but I assume it's similar to a public/private keypair given that they describe it as a cryptographic mechanism.
Given the author of the Python files in the SVN repo, this might not be a bad guess:
# post_election_audit.py
# Ronald L. Rivest
# October 4, 2009
#
# This Python program is for use with the Scantegrity II election system.
# See www.scantegrity.org for information on Scantegrity II.
I remember a Packard Bell Pentium 166 MMX (woah! serious business!) that had 2 USB ports. I had ABSOLUTELY NO EARTHLY IDEA what the flying fsck they were (likely because it shipped with Windows 95).
The next computer I had was an early Pentium III (Slot-I P3 repraSENT!) and it came with USB... speakers. USB F$CKING SPEAKERS. (Granted, they also had a 3.5mm plug for the audio connection, but you could control the volume and audio balance in software! Holy sh&t!) It was incredible at the time.
BASIC is the Computer Science equivalent of `Scientific Creationism'.