I also prophesise that YouTube/Google will not understand broadcast timecodes and will require everything in simple seconds, to two decimal places. Why do they need timecodes? To know where to insert the advertising of course. Will users be able to skip the advertising mid-roll? Not a chance. And what problems will timecodes in seconds, with two decimal places, create? I believe we'll see adverts inserted at the incorrect places as different frame rates between PAL, NTSC and film content are not taken into account, or ad breaks that are placed in content at obvious points like fades/transitions/mixes (whatever you'd like to call them) will be a few frames incorrect, so the transition will happen slightly before or after the ad break.
I also predict that YouTube won't really understand about TV resolution and will request everything at 640x480 frame size, rather than say 720x576 for PAL. I predict they may also have problems dealing with Full Height Anamorphic content, but of course that's just a hunch.
Don't ask me how I know, just looking into my crystal ball you understand.......
Essentially I agree with you. I generally try to checkout the source and build x264 on a monthly basis.
I guess I was just picking up on your comment that the MainConcept H.264 encoder "still lags behind" x264. Historically, it hasn't lagged behind. They've both been very close for some time, in terms of speed and quality.
I'm looking forward to a more up to date comparison, and I hope x264 comes out a clear winner.
The Flash player supports H.264 in the standard MP4 container, not only in the old FLV container.
And in a MOV container.
I'm big supporter, and user, of x264, but I always thought MainConcept was the slightly better H.264 codec.
This codec comparison is a year old now, but I've always used these generally yearly tests as a yard stick. MainConcept and X264 are the clear winners, with MainConcept probably slightly ahead overall. If you're short on time, just start reading at page 30.
You must be covered by a valid TV Licence if you watch or record television programmes as they're being shown on TV. It makes no difference what equipment you use - whether it's a laptop, PC, mobile phone, digital box, DVD recorder or a TV set - you still need a licence.
You do not need a TV Licence to view video clips on the internet, as long as what you are viewing is not being shown on TV at the same time as you are viewing it.
If you use a digital box with a hi-fi system, or another device that can only be used to produce sounds and can't display TV programmes, and you don't install or use any other TV receiving equipment, you don't need a TV Licence.
Just received the following email into my corporate Inbox..... (My real company name replaced with "My Company Name")
Microsoft Office at Home
"My Company Name" is pleased to announce a new scheme for employees arranged by the IT Department.
No sex please, we're British!
Before starting this entry, I should note that Kapital Moto TV is currently just a two man operation. I'm the business and online video brains, my partner Antoine is the developer and server admin. Sometimes, depending on time and availability the lines are blurred. Any simple Linux errors in the processes described below are through my own ignorance and lack of knowledge.
Term: M$
Example: "Typical M$ behaviour. I'm not one bit surprised by this."
Comment: By writing M$ instead of Microsoft or MS, you are reminding the world that some corporations in this world are interested in making money. This is something we all need to remember. If you find M$ being overused, you can also use the term Microsloth. Using either word quickly demonstrates that you're an impartial rational person and that your post will be insightful and balanced.
He who steps on others to reach the top has good balance.