Comment Re:Safe without keys (Score 1) 465
A safe is usually inside a building so ownership of the safe is clear.
An Apple account in the cloud? Not so much.
A safe is usually inside a building so ownership of the safe is clear.
An Apple account in the cloud? Not so much.
I'll bet Apples entire fortune that if it goes to court, the judge will order Apple to unlock the device.
Are you clinically stupid or does it just take practice?
All Apple has done is ask for a legal proof of ownership. At no point have they said they're not going to hand anything over, all they said is "follow the procedure".
And no, a pretty letter on gold-embossed paper doesn't count as "legal proof" of anything. The legal system would collapse if it did.
If the vendor then chose to deny me access and insist I get a court order, I'd be unhappy, angry and deeply disappointed. And I very certainly would never use that vendor again, and I'd warn everybody I could to stay away from that vendor.
Would you feel "unhappy, angry and deeply disappointed" if Apple handed your account over to the first hacker who sent them a letter on embossed paper?
Apple has a procedure in place for this situation, all you have to do is follow it. You may not like the procedure but it exists for a reason.
Are you stupid or just willfully ignorant? Have you heard about the part about furnishing legal documents to prove they were the rightful heirs
Anybody can send letters on offical-looking paper
(along with a photocopy of photoshopped death certificate if you think it helps).
So... all it takes to hack an Apple account is to send them a letter on official-looking paper?
I'll stick with "court order", thanks.
the orthodox jewish community are already suffering the consequences of breeding within a small community. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M...
Didn't know that. +1 Informative.
Nah, it's a classic strawman question used by creationists.
This one is a variant of "irreducible complexity": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
People can (and do!) protest the anti-evolution movements in schools. Often successfully.
You think a six-year-old has the same decision making ability as an 20-year-old?
Is it a coincidence that most street gangs indoctrinate new members around the age of 13?
The "age of consent" thing is a bit arbitrary but it doeshave a basis in reality. Young children are far easier to indoctrinate/persuade than adults.
Do you have more comedy acts?
You are gifted my friend.. LOL...
Me? That's Microsoft's actual list of reasons...I couldn't possibly make it up!
Check it out: https://blogs.technet.com/b/fi...
(Remove all liquids from the vicinity before clicking...)
Don't they know wikipedia exists?
Do you know that conservapedia exists?
Which one is correct? Teach the controversy!
This is the reason that education is *mandatory* in civilized countries - to take some part of the decision-making process away from uninformed parents.
Because DNA is a digital storage medium and genes change in steps.
There's no in-between states when you start modifying DNA just as there's nothing in between 1 and 0 in binary numbers.
Maybe they should also teach them that 2+2=7 and that The Earth is flat. And feed them on nothing but kitkats.
Would you say that was OK, too?
Last time I checked we have child protection to take children away from clueless parents.
Always look over your shoulder because everyone is watching and plotting against you.
