When evidence becomes statistics, statistics are being disputed or worse: banned. You can make this analogy for every genocide and the political movement active or in the future reflecting back to it. We are living in a world where real is almost indistinguishable from made up and fake news. This does not mean we should provide a place of worship for what has been real, similar to other rather successful genres of adult entertainment. Protect what has happened, make sure it is available, in its original underacted form. Find a modus operandi, for example a license a mandatory non-commercial basis like a public library or an archive. Now the question raises: should all evidence, even that has never been published, be in the public domain - or - should we protect and blind people from the truth? The truth may be that psychiatric institutions are underfunded, our legislation fails, or "keep calm an move on".