Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment 5 prison term for *individuals* (Score 5, Interesting) 162

The article is almost gibberish. The proposed law imposes fines and/or a prison term of not more than 5 years, for (1) individuals who know that the data breach law applies, (2) who willfully and intentionally conceal the breach (notably it does not say "fail to notify", but "willfully and intentionally conceal"), (3) in the event that at least $1000 of economic harm occurs to at least one individual.

I'm not a lawyer, but I think the bar for "willfully conceal" is pretty high. I think they're definitely trying to protect "innocent bystanders" who may know about the breach but choose to do nothing for fear of their jobs or livelihoods.

Comment Re:You all need to read the FAQ from the Boring Co (Score 4, Insightful) 155

Chicago already has a very good alternative to tunnels: elevated tracks

That is not a good alternative. The elevated trains are *bone-shatteringly* noisy. I was posted on the 4th floor of a building on Wabash and the effect on productivity was MASSIVE. People think it's no big deal because they're "used to it", but having to mute your conference call every 2 minutes due to train noise is a massive inconvenience. And forget walking! After months of nearly losing my mind walking under those tracks, I finally started hunting down hotels that were far enough away from the tracks that I didn't have to walk parallel to them.

Half a year of working in Chicago and I was ready to murder somebody. It was unbelievably unpleasant.

Comment Re:You all need to read the FAQ from the Boring Co (Score 1) 155

Well, you wouldn't have the expense of digging a goddamn tunnel.

In urban areas, the expense of laying a dedicated through-way for express buses is also extremely high. The land between O'Hare & DT Chicago is very built up; there would be few ways to put in an express lane for a bus without major disruption.

Tunnels dodge a lot of concerns about traffic, safety, land rights, etc. that can add up to big headaches for urban public transit.

Comment Re:Electric skates (Score 2) 155

Not clear to me that the individual skates will require external power. My bet is that he's planning to have some kind of high duty cycle batteries on board. If the skate (with full battery/guidance/motor systems) can be easily detached from the car and replaced with a freshly charged skate, you just need enough skates "in the queue" to handle the load.

Without the need to run high-power electrics through the tunnel, and no risk of human exposure to high-tension power rails or cables, the whole thing could be much simpler to build and maintain.

Comment Re:Electric skates (Score 1) 155

Basically all the costs of a subway with more guidance issues at high speed.

Perhaps a more apt comparison would be a bobsled? I suspect that the tube will be designed to turn the train. I'd guess that for turns at high speed the skate will be designed to move up the wall, like a car on a banked track.

Comment Re:What an odd thing to measure (Score 1) 126

I'm sure people still buy DVDs. But measuring a strict binary -- "Did you rent or purchase physical video media in the last year?" -- they set themselves up to report a strange number, since that includes all the people who bought 1 video. Or 2 videos. These are people who have, for all intents and purposes, switched to something else.

In any case, TFA tells the real story, with video sales dropping from $12 billion per year to under $6 billion per year in just 7 years.

Comment What an odd thing to measure (Score 1) 126

I mean, yes, my family has purchased SOME video in the last year. My wife has purchased exercise videos. I got my MST3K DVDs as part of the Kickstarter.

The more relevant question is, "What *fraction* of entertainment purchasing goes to physical videos?" and the answer is "almost none". But more than none.

Comment Having prepared many reports for C-levels... (Score 1) 273

The issue isn't Excel. The issue is that executives can't articulate what questions they want to answer, so they give a vague specification of some data they'd like to see. Further, they are averse to any followup questions, because they told you exactly what they wanted.

When you pull that data from 3 different and completely un-integrated sources and put it in Excel and make your graphs all pretty and whatnot, the response you get from the executives is that it doesn't tell the right story or still doesn't answer their (still unarticulated) question. And can the columns be blue? The official corporate color scheme is red but we like blue.

This is just reality. Everybody who does reporting has to deal with these complaints.

Submission + - ESA and Airbus Safran agree on deal to build Ariane 6

schwit1 writes: Airbus Safran have come to an agreement with the European Space Agency on building Ariane 6, Europe's next commercial rocket.

The key part of the deal is that ESA and Arianespace will be ceding ownership of the rocket to Airbus Safran.

The French government is likely to approve the sale of CNES's 34-percent stake in the Evry, France-based Arianespace launch service provider to Airbus Safran Launchers at about the same time as the Ariane 6 development contract is signed.

With that sale, Airbus Safran will control Arianespace, which means they will also own the rocket they are building for Arianespace. This is fundamentally different than the situation with Ariane 5, which Airbus built for an Arianespace owned and run by the many-headed ESA. The result was a bloated government-run operation that never made a profit.

Now Airbus will own it instead. They have already indicated that they will trim the costs at Arianespace. More importantly, with ownership will come the freedom to compete effectively in the much more competitive launch market created by the arrival of SpaceX. No need to get permission from ESA to do things.

Submission + - The case for a muon collider succeeding the LHC just got stronger

StartsWithABang writes: If you strike the upper atmosphere with a cosmic ray, you produce a whole host of particles, including muons. Despite having a mean lifetime of just 2.2 microseconds, and the speed of light being 300,000 km/s, those muons can reach the ground! That’s a distance of 100 kilometers traveled, despite a non-relativistic estimate of just 660 meters. If we apply that same principle to particle accelerators, we discover an amazing possibility: the ability to create a collider with the cleanliness and precision of electron-positron colliders but the high energies of proton colliders. All we need to do is build a muon collider. A pipe dream and the stuff of science fiction just 20 years ago, recent advances have this on the brink of becoming reality, with a legitimate possibility that a muon-antimuon collider will be the LHC’s successor.

Submission + - Scientists just automated light-based computers (vice.com)

retroworks writes: Integrated photonic devices are poised to play a key role in a wide variety of applications, ranging from optical interconnects and sensors to quantum computing. However, only a small library of semi-analytically designed devices is currently known. In the article in Nature Photonics, http://www.nature.com/nphoton/... researchers demonstrate the use of an inverse design method that explores the full design space of fabricable devices and allows them to design devices with previously unattainable functionality, higher performance and robustness, and smaller footprints than conventional devices. The designed a silicon wavelength demultiplexer splits 1,300nm and 1,550nm light from an input waveguide into two output waveguides, and the team has fabricated and characterized several devices. The devices display low insertion loss (2dB), low crosstalk (100nm). The device footprint is 2.8×2.8m2, making this the smallest dielectric wavelength splitter.

Slashdot Top Deals

Too many people are thinking of security instead of opportunity. They seem more afraid of life than death. -- James F. Byrnes

Working...