Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Why does tech/sci fi love "Aurora"? (Score 1) 60

I am tempted to go through all the techie and sci-fi uses of the term "Aurora" and make a single record of them all. From spaceship names to project codenames, it seems to be everywhere.

And the female name Kira, Qi'ra, etc.

Aurora is the goddess of Dawn. So, in any techie or sci fi context, it suggests fresh beginnings, a wonderful start to a new era.

Basically, 'Sunrise' from Also Sprach Zarathustra.

Comment Re:No, they aren't. (Score 1) 273

Correlation is not causation/curative treatment.

Well if you want to split hairs, you can never 100% prove causation anyway, at least in something as complex as a human being.

There are (probably) people who take no exercise, sleep four hours a night, drink two bottles of whisky, and smoke 60 cigarettes a day, yet die peacefully in their beds from nothing more than old age at the age of 95.

But on average, you're better off doing at least some moderate exercise, sleeping for 6-8 hours a day, drinking moderately and not smoking.

Comment Re:No, they aren't. (Score 1) 273

I think part of it is just that in maybe 7 out of 10 cases advice like "get more exercise" or "get some bed rest" appears to work because the person doesn't come back with the same complaint.

That's why there now has to be a rule that if someone comes in with chest t pain they MUST be checked for heart problems, because too many doctors were fobbing them off and then thinking they had done well when in fact they didn't come back because they were dead or had a severe stroke.

There aren't many people who wouldn't benefit from some moderate exercise and a regular good night's sleep.

If a doctor recommends these, a sensible diet, and not too much booze/drugs, they are only going to do some good in the vast majority of cases.

But, yes, they do have to diagnose actual illnesses too.

Comment Re:New math (Score 1) 228

My daughter was doing ratios (I think in 5th grade?), and I couldn't understand the method she was taught. I taught her to cross multiply and solve the really basic algebra equation. She completed the assignment, I double-checked the answers and they were correct. Turns it in, zero for a grade because "she didn't follow the correct procedure." Teacher didn't even believe she did it, so had her do several problems on the board, which she did. "Well, sorry that's not the right way to do it."

I'm all for easier or just different ways to do things, but arriving algorithmic-ally at a correct answer should NEVER be "wrong."

If I was a teacher and my 10 year old pupil turned in homework using a different method than the one I'd taught, the options are (a) they're a child prodigy or (b) someone did their homework for them. I know which I'd assume first.

Comment Re:The lesson is to not take away. (Score 1) 79

To be honest I don't understand why they wouldn't want their ads on NSFW pages. How many consumers would avoid a product because they saw it on a porn site? Obviously they themselves don't object to porn, or else they wouldn't be on that site in the first place.

Unfortunately, it's the association, mainstream media publishing stories about how Mrs X was horrified to hear that Brand Y was advertising on a porn site which her husband accidentally tumbled across...

Slashdot Top Deals

Happiness is a hard disk.

Working...