Honest question - what is inside Linux or BSD to prevent a user space malware application from running and encrypting all the files you have r/w access to?
That's akin to saying, "I have absolutely no sympathy for idiots who buy a house when someone breaks in and stabs them. This goes for garages too." The person who took over their account is breaking the law. Period. Not everyone understands security and often re-uses passwords. Do you realize Titan, Schalge and Defiant reuse keys for deadbolts and door locks? Is it ok if I use a set of keys to get into your house and steal everything? "We have no sympathy for idiots who don't understand tumblers and pins of the locks inside their home." How about your car? How about I hack the OBD2 system to make your transmission shift into reverse while you do 70mph down the highway? "I have no sympathy for idiots who don't understand their cars on-board diagnotic system." How about your grandmother who is in intensive care at the hospital? Hospital Wifi is known to be unsecure. Do you have zero sympathy when a hacker shuts down her life supporting systems? Grandma deserves it since she doesn't understand encryption and information security, right?
Turn on two factor authentication and don't reuse passwords. That's the simple lesson here. This 'Crap' you mention has saved a little girl who was kidnapped right in front of their house, led to arrest and prosecution of home invaders who nearly killed a homeowners dog, and cut down on crime in many areas.
I'm pretty sure this is the case - you don't go from copyright complaint on the 5th to raiding a competitors offices on the 11th in most countries.
I think 9/11 is so far back and most Americans are so apathetic they either didn't know or have forgotten 9/11 wasn't the first attack. It wasn't the 2nd. It was in the teens.. Meaning we were in well over double digits. Khobar Towers sound familiar? USS Cole sound familiar? The Twin Towers in NYC had already been bombed once before. We ignored them. We "kept our troops at home." Problem is, the camps in Afghanistan kept pumping out skilled personnel who learned how to bomb and kill people.
Imagine you have a meth lab next door. Would you tell the cops, "Well, don't invade their home. Just arrest the street dealers. That will solve the problem. Leave the meth lab alone." That's exactly what you're saying when you say, "Don't invade Afghanistan." We had to invade Germany to stop Hitler. We had to nuke Japan to get them to stop suicide attacking throughout the Pacific, and we had to invade Afghanistan to stop the Osama Bin Laden sponsored and Taliban (the government back then) hosted terrorist camps. We also invaded Iraq to get them to stop shooting at F-16s and threatening neighbors, but that narrative has been hijacked by the whole "no WMDs found" false flag. Any one recall how many UN security resolutions were passed telling Saddam to knock his shit off?? Anyone? How many talked about WMDs? (hint: almost none)
The problem however, as we learn everywhere is, "Power abhors a vacuum." If you take out one evil power, you are an open host to what ever else can take its place.
Correct. 350k was nothing compared to the rate we were losing soldiers as we island hopped and tried to defeat Japan. They also refused to surrender and would fight to the last person. They were also convincing local populations to commit suicide rather than wait to see what happened when the Allies liberated their lands, although some were also just murdered. Hard to say how much is fact and fiction in these stories. For anyone skeptical, take a look at how many Russians died kicking Germany out. 26 million... and that was mostly on defense. Going onto the offense makes attrition rates go up.
Beeftopia seems to be the only response I've seen that really understands PsyOps (Psychological Operations in warfare), and the differences.
And on a corporate network - you're going to have a hard time with network auth when none of the required agents (ConfigMgr or whatever) report back.
I use an OSSC - (Open Source Scan Converter) - its expensive, but the results are phenomenal.
The only downside to it - it doesn't support composite inputs and some consoles/hardware you'll have to mod before it will work with it (like the Nintendo 64).
The professor makes a difference too - the ones I work with don't like using computers or email.
And yes - before anyone tells me - that computer science really isn't about using computers - I feel that using computers helps students communicate with you about classwork etc.
They could do the second thing server side too.
The EU doesn't care - Borris is like someone who arrives at a car dealership (the EU) with a car that is on fire and screaming "ok what are you going to do about it now?!".
You mention they'll negotiate an arrangement after leaving - well - what position will the UK be in then? Brexit has cost the UK £66 billion so far and they haven't even left yet - lots of companies have left the UK and moved to Europe over trade fears as well - they'll never come back (just like everyone left Quebec after they threatened to leave the union).
Reality itself has a left-wing bias.
Your MS account is a local admin account...
If your not connected to the network the account still works (just like windows has allowed for 30+ years).
Office's days are numbered on the client side - that said I think most people are using the online version or Google Docs.
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new discoveries, is not "Eureka!" (I found it!) but "That's funny ..." -- Isaac Asimov